Posted 31 August 2012 - 12:29 AM
Posted 31 August 2012 - 03:45 AM
Lore-wise i would go for asura , but that maybe me , while sylvari can really fit any profession , since they are born from the dream and all that stuff , i still find that the asura fit the role better , the necromancer in the guild wars 2 web site is an asura is it not?
Now for the looks is a hard choice , i think asura look awesome , even their animations look very cool , but the asura are really small , thus making you have problem if you like to "showoff" , cause well , it is hard to really see how awesome is you legendary small gear.
Only my 2c.
Posted 31 August 2012 - 03:50 AM
I'm very new to GW in general (ie. only played GW1 for little over 2 months before heading over to GW2) so I couldn't tell you much about lore. In GW1 there was a prominent Asuran necromancer named Gadd (a character still mentioned in GW2 in at least one context I know of, and found out after getting stuck into the game). The Asurans are also natural scholars and therefore well suited to these sorts of professions. Without adding further spoilers, another statement has been made within the game itself about necromancy going well with golemancy.
Again, we're talking technicalities when the appearance would be more important to you. Go with what you like. I went with Asura, finding them a better fit for the necro, and got a Sylvari ranger (quite predictably). I agree with the post above that the small size of the Asura is a bit of a hindrance to those looking to strut their stuff. But seriously, is it important for you to look so prominent?
Posted 31 August 2012 - 04:45 PM
Posted 01 September 2012 - 05:33 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users