Aodan, on 20 September 2012 - 01:20 AM, said:
If the track record of how many games won is showing up, then there is a "paper" trail. All I'm saying is either they should do a blanket reimbursement to all players or allow players much like those who got banned, to submit a ticket with screenshots of their wins and ask for a "realistic" reimbursement.
If there was a blanket reimbursement, it would have to be a tiny thing, though, because you might be due 22 chests, but a friend of mine is due one. Should he, and everyone else who's played a tournament ever, get given 5... or 10 chests, for nothing? With you getting only half what you deserve? That doesn't seem fair. Remember, Anet won't reimburse anyone, if they can't do it without causing more problems. This is a case of 'better the devil you know', in that it's better that they just endure the complaints which are coming now, than try to fix it and possibly cause a larger slew of complaints to come in.
But that's only if there is no paper trail. There might be. In which case, we should all be given our correct amount of chests.
Aodan, on 20 September 2012 - 01:20 AM, said:
For the Salvage I would take a screenshot of the Ore/other items and ask for crystals/slivers instead.
The problem with this, is taking screenshots of ore doesn't prove that it came out of your PvP gear. If they don't ask for proof that it came from the gear, what stops people from asking for crystals/slivers in exchange for ore they mined, or salvaged from other equipment?
Aodan, on 20 September 2012 - 01:20 AM, said:
My issue is that if this was endgame PvE content which is getting reimbursed, why can't SPvP also be reimbursed.
*snip*
Us dedicated SPvP players should be treated the same as anything that would be reimbursed in PvE
Unfortuantely, I don't think we don't actually have any evidence that Anet would in fact reimburse endgame PvE content under these circumstances. I don't think it's right to just assume they would, even if they did it in GW1 (I have no idea) because they may take a different approach with GW2.
Aodan, on 20 September 2012 - 01:20 AM, said:
I'm not hating on Anet, I really think their awesome and are putting out a lot for this game. But it's a matter of holding them accountable for content that I'm missing for a paid/live game.
I'm not sure if holding them accountable is an especially strong case, in this situation, because while we did buy the game, and while they do have an obligation to provide the service, it will have been in your terms and conditions that bugs will happen, and that they are not legally responsible for what happens under those circumstances.
I realise you're not trying to sue them, but the strength of your case would be important in making it persuasive to them regardless. I mean, we're not paying a subscription service here, and I know that I would have no case demanding that Bethesda reimburse me for an axe I lost to a terrain bug on Skyrim, for instance.
I might be wrong, but that's how I'm seeing it at the moment.
Aodan, on 20 September 2012 - 01:20 AM, said:
I could only image the back lash if this happens with Paid Tournaments.
This is probably why Paid Tournaments aren't here yet.
Don't get me wrong, Aodan, I don't really disagree with you here, but I'm playing devil's advocate, because I think there are a few flaws in your demands, as I mentioned above. If you ask for the wrong action to be taken, Anet will just say no.