Brand, on 20 February 2013 - 10:18 PM, said:
Strife I had a question for you in light of recent posts on my thread (
#585,
#591,
#595) in which a forum goer asked me to compare this build (Although his version has 5 points in the second tree rather than 10 in the last) with the Warrior build Sonic Boon. My question is to ask you your thoughts on the matter. I do not think that forum goer was a huge expert on the subject, and since I know you from the Warrior forums I figured I'd ask you your opinions. Thanks!
I don't think they're really comparable simply because the utility and skills of guardian are vastly different then warrior.
Specifically for high level fractals and certain dungeons like CM and a few bosses, the huge reflection uptime, protection uptime, and group stability can't really be compared to any other class. I think it's a pretty well known fact that at this point, a guardian offers more defensive options, while a warrior offers more offensive options, simply because of their traits, utility, and weapon skills. It doesn't matter what class, defensive spec, etc. you are at high level fractals for instance, nothing will help your group more as far as staying alive goes then the huge amount of reflection uptime a guardian brings, because it's not possible to tank all the incoming damage on things like shaman or harpy fractal, no matter how defensive you are.
Aegis also offers a decent option for either bursting down some specific bosses or allowing you to revive during bosses and get a block in without using any utility slots. There are countless times where Aegis on my guardian and being able to pop it while rezing a downed person has saved further trouble.
Because of that you usually want one guardian in your group, and of course you want at least one warrior for the dps and damage utility like banner and offensive shouts. So in those situations, it's better to use the guardian as a more defensive anchor class, and the warrior as more offensive then vice versa.
With AH, you also have much more self healing then warrior. Now you don't have the small burst group heals (although you have damage mitigation and more minor heals through protection and regen), but in terms of self-survival and being able to tank, AH is superior. That's why if you run an organized group with 1 anchor, Guardian is the best option because of the healing.
For instance, every 1-1.5s you proc empowering might you heal 360h, everytime you shout and provide 2 boons to everyone, you heal 720h + the more defensive boons from shouts on guardian, everytime you use f1 you heal 1080h, everytime you cast down a symbol you heal 360h/s assuming a full melee group, plus you have your f2 virtue which is a constant ~100h/s heal as well, more defensive elite skills, etc.. Not to mention the Guardian Hammer and GS that are much different then what a warrior brings as a defensive role. I briefly saw one of the posts in that thread about food, but all the guardians I run with as well as myself personally, we use the pies for more self healing. Granted the crit chance of a buffed AH guardian is going to sit around 73% compared to warrior around 89%-99% depending on the build, but food + AH + the defensive boons and reflections just really gives Guardian a superior edge in the "anchor"/defensive department.
All of that really makes Guardian much different because there are things that you want on a Guardian that just can't be compared on a Warrior.
Edited by Strife025, 20 February 2013 - 10:51 PM.