Edited by aguliondew, 18 October 2012 - 03:24 PM.
Legendary Focus - The Minstrel
#31
Posted 18 October 2012 - 03:23 PM
#32
Posted 18 October 2012 - 03:41 PM
I just hope they will improve them in a soon to be patch because otherwise, i don't know how much longer i can't deal with ANet's crap. All three legendaries i wanted are the worst effect wise. :\
#33
Posted 18 October 2012 - 03:44 PM
#34
Posted 18 October 2012 - 05:17 PM
aguliondew, on 18 October 2012 - 03:23 PM, said:
Agreed I didnt know what the anomly looked like. Some one mentioned it on the forums so I linked in chat and I want it so bad now.
#35
Posted 19 October 2012 - 07:41 AM
...I suppose you could transmute the model...
Edited by deathTouch2k, 19 October 2012 - 07:42 AM.
#36
Posted 19 October 2012 - 08:51 AM
Even vision of the mists beat Sunrise IMO(i mean who wants orange blobs behind you as footsteps..eww)
#37
Posted 19 October 2012 - 03:18 PM
#38
Posted 19 October 2012 - 03:35 PM
timmyf, on 18 October 2012 - 03:44 PM, said:
Now thats what im talking about. Do you have the recipe?
#39
Posted 19 October 2012 - 05:37 PM
Linfang, on 19 October 2012 - 03:35 PM, said:
Eldritch Scroll + 10 Mystic Coins + 10 Orichalcum Ingots + 1 Stein of Highlander Beer (16c in Lion's Arch.)
If you want to see it, I've got a screen on my guild page: www.supermegahappyfuntime.com
#40
Posted 27 October 2012 - 05:38 PM
#41
Posted 27 October 2012 - 10:55 PM
timmyf, on 19 October 2012 - 05:37 PM, said:
If you want to see it, I've got a screen on my guild page: www.supermegahappyfuntime.com
Lmao, that is epic win. Now we need a mh weapon that looks like a chair.
#42
Posted 28 October 2012 - 03:01 AM
#43
Posted 29 December 2012 - 02:13 PM
#44
Posted 29 December 2012 - 02:31 PM
#45
Posted 29 December 2012 - 03:00 PM
#46
Posted 30 December 2012 - 12:16 PM
#47
Posted 30 December 2012 - 05:01 PM
I always thought opinions were rather personal.
#48
Posted 02 January 2013 - 07:44 AM
Lordkrall, on 30 December 2012 - 05:01 PM, said:
I always thought opinions were rather personal.
I'd say that a precedent set with their announcements of "legendaries" talking about auras, footsteps, sounds, etc. is enough to claim that an item lacking not just one or two, but ALL of these is objectively not worthy of a Legendary status. No matter how much you troll the forum.
#49
Posted 02 January 2013 - 10:10 AM
AKGeo, on 02 January 2013 - 07:44 AM, said:
Oh, please show me the announcement where they stated that all Legendary Weapons would have auras, footsteps and sounds, I must have missed that one.
As far as I remember the only announcement they made about them was: "They are as strong as exotic weapons but will have unique looks.
#50
Posted 02 January 2013 - 09:30 PM
Lordkrall, on 02 January 2013 - 10:10 AM, said:
As far as I remember the only announcement they made about them was: "They are as strong as exotic weapons but will have unique looks.
The ENTIRE VIDEO. Yes, he says "they can" have these effects, looks changes, etc. But they show all of the ones that do...and none of the ones that do not. Izzy led the community to believe that legendary weapons are ALL going to have SOME effects that impact your entire character or at least draw a modicum of attention to it. Right now, if I were to see the Minstrel on someone walking through LA I wouldn't look twice at it. Everyone notices the Juggernaut, Sunrise, Twilight, and The Bifrost. Nobody sees Incinerator unless you draw it. Nobody notices Quip unless you fire it. Everyone sees Flameseeker Prophecies.
This focus is not legendary. Objectively.
#51
Posted 03 January 2013 - 10:57 AM
People have ASSUMED what ArenaNet means not what ArenaNet said?
Can't say I am surprised.
#52
Posted 03 January 2013 - 11:31 AM
#53
Posted 04 January 2013 - 03:00 AM
Lordkrall, on 03 January 2013 - 10:57 AM, said:
People have ASSUMED what ArenaNet means not what ArenaNet said?
Can't say I am surprised.
They SAID legendaries will have these effects, footsteps, etc. They didn't say "some", they said "they could"...that typically means that each legendary will have a combination of, or all of, those things. Not that some will have none. So far there are three I can think of with none, two of which actually LOOK legendary at the very least (scepter, mace). This one doesn't even do that.
#54
Posted 04 January 2013 - 04:20 AM
AKGeo, on 02 January 2013 - 09:30 PM, said:
He didn't lead anyone to believe anything, since it was released AFTER legendaries were already made by alot of players.
Edited by Sans, 04 January 2013 - 04:22 AM.
#56
Posted 04 January 2013 - 10:30 AM
AKGeo, on 04 January 2013 - 03:00 AM, said:
Exactly, they said COULD, not they WILL.
Could != Will
#57
Posted 04 January 2013 - 03:15 PM
They should really go back and beef up some of the less impressive Legendaries so that players like me (who run Scepter+Focus primarily) have a Legendary we actually want...
#58
Posted 04 January 2013 - 06:23 PM
I would say several of those "awesome Legendaries" that people love the look for are quite silly and ugly, does that mean they are not Legendary?
#59
Posted 04 January 2013 - 10:03 PM
Lordkrall, on 04 January 2013 - 06:23 PM, said:
I would say several of those "awesome Legendaries" that people love the look for are quite silly and ugly, does that mean they are not Legendary?
So majority vote means nothing? I think you're the only person in this thread supporting the "legendary" status of this underwhelming item.
And honestly, if you're going to take the opinion of one person as gospel on the matter, it should be the person who crafted it. Who was underwhelmed.
Not legendary on both counts.
#60
Posted 05 January 2013 - 02:06 PM
There are WAAAAAAAY more people in game than on these forums, so what is stated here should not be taken as a majority.
Legendary is and always will be individual.
No one can decide what I think is Legendary and no one can decide what you or ArenaNet thinks is Legendary.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









