DeagarFA, on 19 November 2012 - 10:55 PM, said:
T1: SBI vs. JQQ vs. SoS - Old Foes & New Blood
#361
Posted 19 November 2012 - 10:57 PM
#362
Posted 19 November 2012 - 11:00 PM
Kleenex, on 19 November 2012 - 10:35 PM, said:
BG already has weak Coverage and guild leaving them to rot, means that they will struggle in Tier 1 (if they move up).
There's a good amount of this post that I'd put in the "mostly wrong" category. BG does not have "weak" coverage. It's not awesome ... we almost never have queues ... but it's not weak.
Here's the thing that most people don't understand. The TA guilds that moved to BG never fielded very big numbers. DiE probably got more players onto maps than any other guild, and that was still around 20 per night. TRF - they never made an impact, and are playing PS2. DtD - I rarely see them anymore. Gin - they're not in my timezone but they're still on BG as far as I know.
Regarding ELTE, they're still on BG, but I'm sure they're considering joining their DiE friends on SoS. It wouldn't surprise me at all if they officially transfer soon. Still ... we're talking about like 5 players per night for them lately.
My point is, the TA guilds that moved to BG are skilled players that enjoy competitive PvP, but many of them were in the process of basically quitting GW2, and the players that remained didn't bring critical mass. I'd say the former TA guild that had the biggest impact on the game post-breakup has been PRX .. by a large margin.
Edited by Global_GW2, 19 November 2012 - 11:02 PM.
#363
Posted 19 November 2012 - 11:03 PM
DeagarFA, on 19 November 2012 - 10:55 PM, said:
Questions? Comments? Conversation? Drop me a message!
#364
Posted 19 November 2012 - 11:04 PM
Cheers
-Duke
#366
Posted 19 November 2012 - 11:05 PM
Mockingjay74, on 19 November 2012 - 11:03 PM, said:
Sorry, you're correct, they weren't. They did, however, roll on NSP with AA and xfer off NSP with AA. They also coordinated with AA (In so far as they hit EB hard while AA stayed away from EB).
Thus, I consider them the main fighting force of AA.
Edited by DeagarFA, 19 November 2012 - 11:06 PM.
#367
Posted 19 November 2012 - 11:07 PM
Beastgate, on 19 November 2012 - 10:46 PM, said:
Yeah iirc when CND quit I think PRX was sitting at around 470 members, so yeah they were the largest. PRX and a few guilds were initially going to stick together but had differing thoughts on to what servers to roll so they split. Apart from maybe 2 butthurt guilds everyone in TA remained friendly towards each other.
DeagarFA, on 19 November 2012 - 10:55 PM, said:
MaLeVoLenT_1, on 19 November 2012 - 10:57 PM, said:
Lolwut? The only way AA could be considered a "top alliance" was the fact there were so few alliances so they were top by default. Nothing about them in game was top.
#368
Posted 19 November 2012 - 11:09 PM
Atticus, on 19 November 2012 - 08:28 PM, said:
Ahh Atticus What Guild are you plying in now.
#369
Posted 19 November 2012 - 11:10 PM
Mixology, on 19 November 2012 - 09:49 PM, said:
I think bandwagoners should just own it (DiE, DA, etc.) instead of making all the excuses for it.
edit: deleted reference to dragonbrand guilds
#370
Posted 19 November 2012 - 11:10 PM
#371
Posted 19 November 2012 - 11:13 PM
bieberfanxoxo, on 19 November 2012 - 11:07 PM, said:
Of the handful of NA alliances you have to put AA at 2nd. They brought ET to be a top 3 server and even though they never really got to the #1 spot they were a serious threat.
#372
Posted 19 November 2012 - 11:13 PM
DayByDay, on 19 November 2012 - 11:10 PM, said:
That clutch [Sanctuary]? /flex
Edited by Aso, 19 November 2012 - 11:15 PM.
#373
Posted 19 November 2012 - 11:15 PM
But it seems like SBI and JQ underestimated them quite a lot. Perhaps they've spent too much time in T1 as part of the old-guard and have become stagnant in their tactics instead of developing new ones. And they thought it would just be another week of the same.
But there are a lot of big, bad great white sharks swimming under the waterline in the Sea of Sorrows. And they smell blood in the water.
#374
Posted 19 November 2012 - 11:16 PM
chuckles79, on 19 November 2012 - 11:10 PM, said:
No offense chuckles, but you pay attention to the goings on in the WvW scene enough for me to not believe this statement. By the time you transferred, you knew PRX had transferred, and knew that TacSym and company had transferred. Strong NA WvW guilds moved to a server that already had good off-hour coverage. The writing was on the wall and you knew that. I'm not knocking your decision to transfer, but let's be fair here. It's wasn't just for the "community".
#375
Posted 19 November 2012 - 11:22 PM
Global_GW2, on 19 November 2012 - 11:00 PM, said:
The 2 weeks of boredom, being the climb through tier 2 and 3 against dead servers coupled with ps2 beta was the nail in the coffin for them. So when BG hit t1 they weren't there to make an impact.
As for ELTE and DiE. Both are top tier guilds that should be in tier 1, as do alot of ex-TA. Throughout the whole of the BG tier 1 fights those guilds were always out there, outmanned and fighting against leads they couldn't hope to come back against. They fought hard, they were unpredictable in where they'd attack or be, they're perfect competition for any offpeak populations in tier 1. It's good to see DiE on SoS and I really hope ELTE join them soon.
DeagarFA, on 19 November 2012 - 11:13 PM, said:
I'm sorry but I don't consider just making tier 1 the requirement for top server/guild/alliance. AA consistently gave up against odds, quit 24hour matchups entirely and never showed the constant effort or pressence they put in when they were in tier 2. TBH I think they had the numbers and guilds to be one of the top, but the problem is, if they couldn't have first they didn't even care about second or putting up any kind of a fight, they just quit, and that's not top, that's pathetic.
#376
Posted 19 November 2012 - 11:23 PM
Global_GW2, on 19 November 2012 - 11:16 PM, said:
Despite what many seem to think, most of our guild is PvE and finding a friendly community in both WvW and PvE was the upmost importance.
SoS did not have a significant NA population at that time, TSym being the only large NA guild, they definitely had gaps. We didn't expect that they would be going to T1 and no one thought at that time that we would do well if we did.
I'm sorry if this blows holes in everyone's favorite theories about stacking; but it was thorough vetting process that did not discriminate due to rankings.
Besides, that was the week after the massive migration to BG; so if the quest for T1 glory was our cause, we would have gone there.
#377
Posted 19 November 2012 - 11:28 PM
New nicknames for SoS: Sea of Stacked, Sea of Denravi, Henge of Sorrows?
#378
Posted 19 November 2012 - 11:32 PM
Hennet, on 19 November 2012 - 08:33 PM, said:
lol "bring your server up the ranks like SoS did!".
not to put you down or anything, but BG inspired a lot of the guilds from DB to move to SoS during our rise from T4. You guys "followed" our rise. (in terms of chronological order). and also, to be specific, our allied guild and a few guilds from DB were close "rivals" in good terms.
I've been part of my guild alliance for over 5 years. If they go, there isn't any point for me to stay.
#379
Posted 19 November 2012 - 11:34 PM
bieberfanxoxo, on 19 November 2012 - 11:22 PM, said:
As for ELTE and DiE. Both are top tier guilds that should be in tier 1, as do alot of ex-TA. Throughout the whole of the BG tier 1 fights those guilds were always out there, outmanned and fighting against leads they couldn't hope to come back against. They fought hard, they were unpredictable in where they'd attack or be, they're perfect competition for any offpeak populations in tier 1. It's good to see DiE on SoS and I really hope ELTE join them soon.
For the record I wasn't knocking them. I was a bit unhappy with a particular DiE member being overly hateful on map chat towards other guilds, but that was frustration speaking and it happens sometimes. I'm bummed they transferred but it was probably for the best for everyone. Although it would be funny to see ELTE join SoS after making a video basically calling their Oceanics "unorganized and unskilled" when they were vacationing on Maguuma during one of BGs blowout matches.
#381
Posted 19 November 2012 - 11:56 PM
#382
Posted 20 November 2012 - 12:28 AM
DeagarFA, on 19 November 2012 - 08:59 PM, said:
http://blacklion.enjin.com/charity
As someone who is doing their best to see SoS lose I'm not sure how I feel about that...
Think of the children!
#384
Posted 20 November 2012 - 12:32 AM
MaLeVoLenT_1, on 19 November 2012 - 10:46 PM, said:
No they were one of the few guilds in the Ascension alliance that was in WvW consistently through thick and thin.
Mockingjay74, on 19 November 2012 - 11:03 PM, said:
They weren't, and after the ascension alliance moved servers they were asked not to follow (nice to see how that turned out).
Anyway, the stalemate at bluelake last night on SoS borderlands was absolutely epic. All three sides were at it for 30 minutes in the field next to the tower, just waiting for the JQ forces to attack the SBI forces. This ladies and gentlemen is what you can expect out of tier one. Props to the guys from JQ and SBI for the great fight (damn I should have turned on Bandicam
Edited by Tarkus, 20 November 2012 - 12:43 AM.
#385
Posted 20 November 2012 - 01:01 AM
SoS used to do really well during oceanic primetime (we were one of the two "go-to" servers for australian guilds - IoJ begin the other one). We had minimal NA/Asian/EU coverage so we used to go from +695 for a few hours down to +0 during NA primetime. We were T4 ranked 10 for a few weeks. Our losses to FA and TC were weird as we never faced those players directly.
About five weeks back Defiance (RUN) moved to SoS, but left after about four days because they felt too lonely in the NA timeslot.
About four weeks back we had the DB guilds (TSym, Sexy etc), then PRX and RMA, and a few others, all move in the space of about a week.
The only other major guild that has come in since is DiE last week.
I really like where SoS is at the moment. It is really is the co-operation, and mutual respect between guilds, that is proving successful.
PRX is great, but I think if you think that you only need to worry about PRX then I am not sure you have been playing much against us this week?
#386
Posted 20 November 2012 - 01:07 AM
Beastgate, on 19 November 2012 - 11:28 PM, said:
New nicknames for SoS: Sea of Stacked, Sea of Denravi, Henge of Sorrows?
Any chance you think about this option again ? You know, it seems SoS offesr a much better environment for a hardcore PvPer like you than SBI does, really, just check the scores and the forums.
#387
Posted 20 November 2012 - 01:14 AM
J Q: 76,718 +235
SBI: 74,146 +185
#389
Posted 20 November 2012 - 02:31 AM
#390
Posted 20 November 2012 - 02:51 AM
Wotah, on 19 November 2012 - 08:03 PM, said:
Also look up the history of EC, which only started after Menaace was kicked for flaming off the server. The TW things started when Menaace felt the need to edit something as a 'Writer' for the forum. Yes, he had mod privileges for all of a week and did most of this himself.
Perhaps I was too harsh in saying they did nothing of note. I meant that other guilds have done the same in the same timeframe. Menaace was great when he first came to the server he generally wanted to help and seemed to be a great addition. Somewhere in the time he started to the few weeks prior to this he flipped his lid and went kind of crazy. TW (now of SoR), FIRE, ESOL all have good commanders and all of which did the same as MMAC. AoS is a great contribution to this, and we're glad they stayed on.
If you have any specific questions ask me you can PM me here, you can pm me over on jadequarry.com on Woade.
No, I'm not related to MMAC or their followers in any way. I just liked how they organised that bunch of randoms in JQ borderlands in T2 fights. We as a small pvp/wuvwuv oriented guild from germany searched for a server with a 24/7 coverage because some of have strange working times and Desolation (the server we had since the 2.bwe) was not what we had hoped for. So we searched for an us server with a great community and JQ, SBI and Maguuma where ranked top in our list in the end.
JQ community is still great and that's one reason to stay there and it doesn't matter where this may end or where JQ is going.
But I really don't think that flame wars on the community side are necessary. There are some things that won't change and that's where mods should do their work.
- there will be people who really dislike each other. That's ok, but it's not wise to choose a side as a community moderator.
- there will be a horde of winning team joiners if servers are nice/successful/large/popular - you gotta live with that
And this a good community has to face. I still don't know why some of the "original" guilds were leaving JQ just because of some different views between guilds or alliances - I stopped reading those threads because it was wasted time.
And last but not least. JQ has some awesome guilds, many of them were on JQ long before me, some came by later and some just suck, but it's easier ignoring some things then investing time in flame wars - you don't have to like anyone in a game and some people turn to idiots by gaining to much e-fame and that where a slight "I don't care, I do my stuff" helps.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

This topic is locked








