All I thought was I can't loose the 100 blades' last two hits, which deal huge amount of damage, (maybe) over 15 times than normal sword swings. I thought finishing the last two hits would be worth even if I downed and have someone to heal me up. Maybe this idea wasn't so wise.
I was downed because of 100 blades twice and my colleagues seemed to be annoyed. I gave up finishing 100 blades in the rest of the run but was downed because of some carelessness. I don't know if it was my carelessness or it was my semi-glasscannon build. I was targeted and hit by the boss, nearly in downed state (about 2000hp left, one hit and down), I dodged out for the next two hits from boss, and expecting any healing because the only healing skill I have is in its 25s CD, but only the ranger in my group place a ground healing, both guardian and ele did nothing. The boss targeted me with kind of fire, I downed very soon. OK, they started to laugh at me and I chose not answering.
I could have swapped to rifle that did less than half of output comparing to a greatsword. I could have put survival slot skills rather than frenzy and for great justice. I could have kept myself from being targeted by boss. I will do all that with my supportive ele and ranger, but as a warrior, I chose to fight in melee range, do as much output as I can and finish the run as fast as possible.
Do you really wish to see a warrior in easy dungeon having a supportive build or having 3200 armor with survival slot skills while guardian and ele are doing output?
I need your opinions. If you don't like a warrior like me, I would never use warrior for dungeon without my friends any more.
Edited by tmxkn1, 22 November 2012 - 10:45 AM.