T1: SoS Vs. JQQ Vs. SBI - Now let's see with no PvE
#691
Posted 30 November 2012 - 05:10 AM
#692
Posted 30 November 2012 - 05:12 AM
Rookie of the year, on 30 November 2012 - 04:52 AM, said:
I still play on JQ.
MMAC was the reason JQ was first.. I'm glad 3rd place is fun to you w/o them since they left JQ sunk like a rock can't argue with that.
Edited by Walker, 30 November 2012 - 05:12 AM.
#693
Posted 30 November 2012 - 05:21 AM
Walker, on 30 November 2012 - 05:12 AM, said:
MMAC was the reason JQ was first.. I'm glad 3rd place is fun to you w/o them since they left JQ sunk like a rock can't argue with that.
#694
Posted 30 November 2012 - 05:34 AM
Walker, on 30 November 2012 - 05:12 AM, said:
MMAC was the reason JQ was first.. I'm glad 3rd place is fun to you w/o them since they left JQ sunk like a rock can't argue with that.
#695
Posted 30 November 2012 - 05:37 AM
Let's keep this show running.
Edited by Azz, 30 November 2012 - 05:37 AM.
#696
Posted 30 November 2012 - 05:46 AM
Azz, on 30 November 2012 - 05:37 AM, said:
Let's keep this show running.
you're a good sport, I should be hating you as an SBI but I can't right now because you seem like such a nice guy.
see you on the battlefield.
#697
Posted 30 November 2012 - 05:58 AM
Walker, on 30 November 2012 - 05:12 AM, said:
MMAC was the reason JQ was first.. I'm glad 3rd place is fun to you w/o them since they left JQ sunk like a rock can't argue with that.
Abandon the leader of MMAC by your own guild members is a fact and can't argue with that either.
Edited by Rookie of the year, 30 November 2012 - 06:00 AM.
#698
Posted 30 November 2012 - 06:09 AM
#700
Posted 30 November 2012 - 06:38 AM
Vihar, on 30 November 2012 - 04:33 AM, said:
Oh, I see.
Those 40 man SoS groups are all underlevelled, undergeared noobs.
That explains a lot.
The butt hurt is strong with this one. Good for a laugh anyway.
#701
Posted 30 November 2012 - 06:40 AM
Rookie of the year, on 30 November 2012 - 04:52 AM, said:
Seriously, JQ would rather be in 3rd than have server jumping bipolar guilds crying all the time =D
#703
Posted 30 November 2012 - 06:52 AM
Jedbacca, on 30 November 2012 - 05:10 AM, said:
Hollow words coming from SF/RAGE. The biggest forum trolls in this thread and SBI community forums. Paraphrase: "Oh you guys suck at PvP. We roll you 1 v 2. You only win because you outnumber us." NEWSFLASH: We do not outnumber you 2:1. Plus on both resets, SOS has led from the first tick for the first 24 hours.
#704
Posted 30 November 2012 - 07:00 AM
See everyone on the field at shuffle, and win or lose, GG!
#705
Posted 30 November 2012 - 07:01 AM
Plasticblanket, on 30 November 2012 - 06:09 AM, said:
Umm... Depends on whether they are winning or not. If not winning, they are busy with PVE, RL, other events or outmanned buffs (excuses like you outnumber us 10-1). If not losing, they are having great fights, camping JP, etc. I learn all these special codes from these mighty warriors on this forum. I know what excuses I'll use for whichever occassions.
#706
Posted 30 November 2012 - 07:12 AM
Taram, on 30 November 2012 - 06:52 AM, said:
You forgot SENT. Although their players are quite when we are losing.
#710
Posted 30 November 2012 - 08:28 AM
Let's keep this interesting, keep it fun and leave the trash talk to the forum warriors. Those of us who showed up on the WvW battlefield consistently this week know we fought hard. Best to also accept that your opponents fought hard too and are worthy of respect.
/salute
#712
Posted 30 November 2012 - 11:29 AM
FBRin, on 30 November 2012 - 01:06 AM, said:
It was never competitive. It wasn't designed to be competitive. It will never be competitive. Bragging about wvw wins is like bragging about winning a basketball game when the other team showed up with 1 guy.
Just grab a group or 3 of your friends and attack some people. You'll find you have less to complain about if you don't worry about the scoreboard and just fight. Just avoid the zergs from whichever server is currently 'outskilling' the others with double the coverage. Hell gather up on one map to make it even better.
QFT
#713
Posted 30 November 2012 - 12:09 PM
Taram, on 30 November 2012 - 06:52 AM, said:
you do.
you do.
you are right on the third point. It's at least 3:1
#715
Posted 30 November 2012 - 12:22 PM
#716
Posted 30 November 2012 - 12:31 PM
Y'ALL GET BENT!
Ah. Much quicker than bothering to think of snappy responses and hollow excuses. Just get bent. Please? So I can beat you up while you're drunk? C'mon!!!!
#717
Posted 30 November 2012 - 01:27 PM
SoS deserved it, SBI was always bragging to much
No modesty.. geesh
Edited by MisterSin, 30 November 2012 - 01:27 PM.
#718
Posted 30 November 2012 - 01:42 PM
A brief history of reasons why <Insert Server Name> is rank 1:
HoD
Own Server:
We are more skilled. We are more organized. We have a great server community.
Others:
You have more coverage.
JQ
Own Server:
We are more skilled. We are more organized. We have a great server community.
Others:
You have more coverage. HoD imploded.
SBI
Own Server:
We are more skilled. We are more organized. We have a great server community.
Others:
You have more coverage. HoD imploded. Many guilds left JQ.
<Sea of Sorrows>
Own Server:
We are more skilled.
We are more organized.
We have a great server community.
Others:
You have more coverage. HoD imploded. Many guilds left JQ. Many SBI people went to PvE.
#719
Posted 30 November 2012 - 02:03 PM
Maybe that's a technicality.
Thanks for the update.
#720
Posted 30 November 2012 - 02:11 PM
MrZero, on 30 November 2012 - 01:54 AM, said:
Now why the hell would there be any guild vs. guild content in a game called Guild Wars 2?
This is a frequent topic of discussion in my guild.
ANet doesn't really have anything that makes guilds important in any particular way. We don't even have guildhouses, let alone any sort of guild vs guild entertainment.
Now back on topic.
Congrats on the win SoS.
I fear this coming week may be even less competitive than this week was, but I hope not.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









