BG vs. SoR vs. IoJ - The New Content Hangover
#61
Posted 27 November 2012 - 04:09 AM
#62
Posted 27 November 2012 - 04:23 AM
There was a scenario last night (oceanic time) where IOJ were positively pounding us in EB and had a large force holding us at bay from pushing into other areas on the map. At this time BG was sitting 3rd on the table, with the lowest ppt. Now, is there anything wrong with IOJ’s tactic? Not at all. Does it mean they are playing for 2nd place? Not necessarily, and it doesn’t bloody well matter. It made for some good fighting is all I know.
There is a certain irony in the fact that there is less posturing on the battlefield than there is on the forums.
#63
Posted 27 November 2012 - 06:50 AM
Mif, on 27 November 2012 - 04:04 AM, said:
Too hard to attack the server in first place? They too strong for you?
are they attacking the right guys now? is this ok?
Edited by Ramanadjinn, 27 November 2012 - 06:52 AM.
#64
Posted 27 November 2012 - 08:14 AM
Also pretty sure that if they were focusing us, once they split BG/SoR BL, which they virtually always do since IoJ can only cover 2 maps consistently, they'd just hop on over to IoJ and push us non-stop. So far the only time that's happened was during EU time when RK/DR(sp? It's deutsch) got their PvDoor on. And that was only after they'd made virtually every other map an ugly shade of green.
So yeah, nobody is working together or playing for anything but #1. It's all about being opportunistic. If SoR is fighting tenaciously, and IoJ has... nobody on, why not target IoJ? Hell, I would. The same holds true for any server against any server.
I'm having fun this match regardless. Been lots of good fights, whatever the score may read. We'll be seeing each other for a few weeks yet if Tier 1/3 hold, so no need to get all uppity.
Edited by Jacbo, 27 November 2012 - 08:24 AM.
#65
Posted 27 November 2012 - 08:22 AM
SoR BL at least has some Green on it but no red at all while there are some Red on Bg BL.
also it was truely pvdoor we should have had 695 ppt right ?
#67
Posted 27 November 2012 - 09:08 AM
If your nameplate is red, I'm gonna stab the crap out of you. Doesn't matter how many you bring, I will take people down with me.
#68
Posted 27 November 2012 - 10:32 AM
PS: Ninja golem rush yesterday vid! Enjoy!
Edited by Nirvii, 27 November 2012 - 11:39 AM.
#69
Posted 27 November 2012 - 01:28 PM
#70
Posted 27 November 2012 - 04:13 PM

Great job BG!
#72
Posted 27 November 2012 - 04:55 PM
Mif, on 27 November 2012 - 04:21 AM, said:
I think it's rather lame to come on here and brag about how you're catching the leader when in reality you're just effectively double teaming with the leader to take 2nd place.
Anyway, I'm done.
Sure seems like it in this post.
#73
Posted 27 November 2012 - 06:37 PM
Gully, on 27 November 2012 - 09:08 AM, said:
If your nameplate is red, I'm gonna stab the crap out of you. Doesn't matter how many you bring, I will take people down with me.
^This. Of course you will see less battles between the other two servers when you have your own battles to fight.
#74
Posted 27 November 2012 - 06:56 PM
Prop to all the ppl who fight hard and make WvW fun
#75
Posted 28 November 2012 - 02:09 AM
#76
Posted 28 November 2012 - 02:19 AM
Score Update (based on last data entry at http://mos.millenium.org/matchups#NA):
BG - 121,913 + 445 (+72 ppt average for the match from extra Yak points / error)
SOR - 117,188 + 175 (+19 ppt average for the match from extra Yak points / error)
IOJ - 110,528 + 75 (+88 ppt average for the match from extra Yak points / error)

Battle for First (BG v SOR): SOR needs a 18 PPT Lead (58% plausible)
BG Current (445) v SOR Current (175) = SOR will not take 1st
BG Min (95) v SOR Max (455) = SOR 1st in 2 Hour(s) (Wednesday 1:04 AM)
BG Min (95) v SOR Avg (274) = SOR 1st in 4 Hour(s) (Wednesday 2:57 AM)
BG Avg (233) v SOR Max (455) = SOR 1st in 4 Hour(s) (Wednesday 2:14 AM)
Battle for Second (SOR v IOJ): IOJ needs a 25 PPT Lead (20% plausible)
SOR Current (175) v IOJ Current (75) = IOJ will not take 2nd
SOR Min (70) v IOJ Max (345) = IOJ 2nd in 4 Hour(s) (Wednesday 2:39 AM)
SOR Min (70) v IOJ Avg (188) = IOJ 2nd in 9 Hour(s) (Wednesday 7:15 AM)
SOR Avg (274) v IOJ Max (345) = IOJ 2nd in 14 Hour(s) (Wednesday 12:35 PM)
Battle for First (BG v IOJ): IOJ needs a 43 PPT Lead (23% plausible)
BG Current (445) v IOJ Current (75) = IOJ will not take 1st
BG Min (95) v IOJ Max (345) = IOJ 1st in 7 Hour(s) (Wednesday 5:41 AM)
BG Min (95) v IOJ Avg (188) = IOJ 1st in 18 Hour(s) (Wednesday 4:40 PM)
BG Avg (233) v IOJ Max (345) = IOJ 1st in 15 Hour(s) (Wednesday 1:42 PM)
Edited by Global_GW2, 28 November 2012 - 02:41 AM.
#77
Posted 28 November 2012 - 08:24 AM
Who is worse than another, when they both hired the same merc to kill each other. /shrug sounds like a tragedy
#78
Posted 28 November 2012 - 08:26 AM
I think we did pretty well considering we were out-manned the majority of the night and SoR had some big numbers.

We'll see you all tomorrow!
#79
Posted 28 November 2012 - 08:44 AM
#80
Posted 28 November 2012 - 09:06 AM
Enjoy
#81
Posted 28 November 2012 - 11:06 AM
#82
Posted 28 November 2012 - 11:19 AM
xcalamity, on 28 November 2012 - 11:06 AM, said:
I got a video with Choco and I doing a dungeon! ( well trying, we kinda failed some
#84
Posted 28 November 2012 - 02:40 PM
Arctix, on 28 November 2012 - 08:26 AM, said:
I think we did pretty well considering we were out-manned the majority of the night and SoR had some big numbers.
We'll see you all tomorrow!
It was a pleasure to fight you legacy. How many did you have out in BG BL last night?
Commander Empress of Eternity [SPQR] [SoR]
Edited by Frozire, 28 November 2012 - 04:57 PM.
No exploit discussion
#85
Posted 28 November 2012 - 02:41 PM
Also having your whole zerg attacking green lake while we cap bay and red briar probably wasn't the smartest move. =P
#86
Posted 28 November 2012 - 04:57 PM
Hellsaint, on 28 November 2012 - 08:24 AM, said:
Who is worse than another, when they both hired the same merc to kill each other. /shrug sounds like a tragedy
THEY MUST BE TEAMING UP!!!!
Stop wasting bandwith!
#88
Posted 28 November 2012 - 08:11 PM
Concerned_Player, on 28 November 2012 - 05:03 PM, said:
I think the thing that has so many of the SoR people up in arms is the fact that this wasn't just a guild group doing this (like was the case on SoR glitching Hills). It was the entire BG zerg on the BG BL at the time (roughly 30-40 strong during one attempt, mind you there were 4 attempts with this glitch in a 2 hour stretch). Perhaps some of them were oblivious to the circumstances, but you can't tell me no one noticed the guy drop the portal outside the keep first and then glitch in to drop the second portal. At least if you were trying to hide it from your realm mates, you would drop the portal inside first and hop the wall back out to drop the second portal in an attempt to make them think a mesmer was hidden inside.
In the end, it is what it is and we have to move on. Let's all make an attempt to catch these fools and make these matches clean from here on out.
#89
Posted 28 November 2012 - 10:40 PM
Lalnuir, on 28 November 2012 - 02:41 PM, said:
Also having your whole zerg attacking green lake while we cap bay and red briar probably wasn't the smartest move. =P
Concerned_Player, on 28 November 2012 - 05:03 PM, said:
Yarz Widow said:
This match is incredibly close and anyone can move for a second upset at this point in the week.
#90
Posted 29 November 2012 - 01:05 AM
Cmon BG!!
edit because no score updates in a while
BG: 156177 +80
SOR 152516 +495
IOJ 139054 +120
Edited by bagsy, 29 November 2012 - 01:07 AM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









