Jump to content

  • Curse Sites
Help
- - - - -

"Looking for group" sub-forum

lfg lfg forum new forum

  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

Poll: Would you like a LFG forum? (17 member(s) have cast votes)

Would you like to see us create a LFG forum?

  1. Yes (8 votes [47.06%])

    Percentage of vote: 47.06%

  2. No (9 votes [52.94%])

    Percentage of vote: 52.94%

Would you use the LFG forum?

  1. Yes (6 votes [35.29%])

    Percentage of vote: 35.29%

  2. No (11 votes [64.71%])

    Percentage of vote: 64.71%

Would you prefer something like an IRC channel instead?

  1. Yes (5 votes [29.41%])

    Percentage of vote: 29.41%

  2. No (12 votes [70.59%])

    Percentage of vote: 70.59%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Desert Rose

Desert Rose

    Vanguard Scout

  • Members
  • 347 posts

Posted 08 December 2012 - 10:45 PM

Anyone else thinks we should have a "Looking for group" sub-forum in the "The Pavilion - Community Content" section?
I cannot be the only one who would like to organize a group e.g. for a dungeon a little more thoughtfully than with just the ingame chat and the gw2lfg website.

Edited by Khalija, 10 December 2012 - 08:02 PM.


#2 Khalija

Khalija

    Leaf on the Wind

  • Administrators
  • Curse Premium
  • 4178 posts
  • Profession:Mesmer
  • Server:Jade Quarry

Posted 10 December 2012 - 08:01 PM

We'd like to hear from the rest of the community on this one. Is this something you'd use? Would you prefer something else (i.e., real-time chat channel)? I'll make it a poll. If you have something to add other than what you voted for, please reply to the thread.

Feel free to PM me if you have a question regarding moderation, want to leave some feedback, or just want to chat!


#3 yahikodrg

yahikodrg

    Vanguard Scout

  • Members
  • 151 posts
  • Guild Tag:[TOR]
  • Server:Sea of Sorrows

Posted 17 December 2012 - 06:39 AM

I think it has good intentions but with gw2lfg.com already out there for players to use to find a group we really don't need another place. It is like when the game was less than a month old and you had players shouting in /map outside the dungeon and in cities, you just would spread the population around and make it more difficult to find a group. The more concentrated we all are using the same LFG tool(hopefully we get one in game sooner rather than later) the easier it is to find a group.

Now if you had a sub forum that was meant to look for members to fill a permanent group is a different story because I had to use the general discussion section because it didn't fall under any other sub forum.

Edited by yahikodrg, 17 December 2012 - 06:40 AM.


#4 Doctor Overlord

Doctor Overlord

    If you hate MMOs....

  • Members
  • 5203 posts
  • Location:Austin, TX
  • Server:Sanctum of Rall

Posted 25 February 2013 - 03:43 AM

I rather wanted to see one but I did not know about the gw2lfg.com website.   I suppose it might be best to limit the number of them, but I don't think it would hurt to have one here on Guru too.

#5 Khalija

Khalija

    Leaf on the Wind

  • Administrators
  • Curse Premium
  • 4178 posts
  • Profession:Mesmer
  • Server:Jade Quarry

Posted 26 February 2013 - 09:23 PM

Until the in-game LFG functionality improves, I've added a redirect to gw2lfg.com under The Pavilion - Community Content.

Feel free to PM me if you have a question regarding moderation, want to leave some feedback, or just want to chat!


#6 Azure Skye

Azure Skye

    Golem Rider

  • Members
  • 2099 posts
  • Location:(づ。*◕__◕。)づ・。*。✧・゜゜・。✧・。*。✧ Magic!
  • Profession:Mesmer
  • Guild Tag:[CUTE]
  • Server:Dragonbrand

Posted 13 March 2013 - 03:31 AM

View PostKhalija, on 26 February 2013 - 09:23 PM, said:

Until the in-game LFG functionality improves, I've added a redirect to gw2lfg.com under The Pavilion - Community Content.
I guess there is anoter one now, khalija. http://gw2lfg.net/

Gotten from this reddit thread.   http://www.reddit.co..._consider_this/

Edited by Azure Skye, 13 March 2013 - 03:31 AM.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users