Price of the Dreamer?
#1
Posted 25 December 2012 - 10:33 PM
#2
Posted 25 December 2012 - 11:33 PM
#4
Posted 26 December 2012 - 02:23 AM
The creator of a legendary should not be able to sell it off like this.
#5
Posted 26 December 2012 - 02:37 AM
Trei, on 26 December 2012 - 02:23 AM, said:
The creator of a legendary should not be able to sell it off like this.
Anet has already said their peace on that. Someone wants to put alot of time into it then they can sell into obtaining their legendary then they can sell it if they want to. Achievement isn't granted until equipped. They are basically just selling time invested, karma, and wvw. The rest of the pieces have a TP price and are calculated into what people are willing to pay.
#6
Posted 26 December 2012 - 03:04 AM
Lurker14ownz, on 26 December 2012 - 02:37 AM, said:
Or are they already?
Weapons of Legends do not end up on some mere marketplace.
Does anet realize the message it is sending here?
#7
Posted 26 December 2012 - 04:53 AM
Lurker14ownz, on 26 December 2012 - 02:37 AM, said:
Anet has already said their peace on that. Someone wants to put alot of time into it then they can sell into obtaining their legendary then they can sell it if they want to. Achievement isn't granted until equipped. They are basically just selling time invested, karma, and wvw. The rest of the pieces have a TP price and are calculated into what people are willing to pay.
#8
Posted 26 December 2012 - 11:40 AM
Lurker14ownz, on 26 December 2012 - 02:37 AM, said:
The funny thing is that sometimes someone is willing to pay 3000g+ for twilight if you buy all things from TP its around 1200g~ + the time you need to spend on karma farming and the wvw/dungeon tokens its funny to see how much gold you can make with this.
#9
Posted 26 December 2012 - 11:46 AM
rotsono, on 26 December 2012 - 11:40 AM, said:
Yeah, which is a dead-sure sign that those people really have no clue and you don't come by 3000g+ without having a clue, unless of course - Santa was particularly generous this year.
I doubt people who invest THAT much money in GW2, buy from Arena Net - simply because they want the biggest bang for their buck, so if I were ANet, I'd investigate those bidders first thing.
Sidenote to the OP: Don't forget the listing fee, so even if you get it in a couple of weeks - you'll probably have to farm some hundred G more just to list it.
#10
Posted 26 December 2012 - 02:07 PM
#11
Posted 26 December 2012 - 02:11 PM
#12
Posted 26 December 2012 - 02:24 PM
Trei, on 26 December 2012 - 03:04 AM, said:
Does anet realize the message it is sending here?
Or: don't use lore to justify game mechanics.
That'll conclude my offtopicness. Carry on.
Edited by Arduin, 26 December 2012 - 02:25 PM.
Feeling your post got wrongfully deleted? Thread locked? Want to chat? Send me a PM. I won't bite :eek:
Be wary of expressing your opinion as fact; facts can be proven wrong.
#13
Posted 26 December 2012 - 03:36 PM
Arduin, on 26 December 2012 - 02:24 PM, said:
Or: don't use lore to justify game mechanics.
That'll conclude my offtopicness. Carry on.
They just found legends....
#14
Posted 26 December 2012 - 03:41 PM
atreoo, on 26 December 2012 - 02:07 PM, said:
Legendary weapons are also not meant for casual gamers.
#15
Posted 26 December 2012 - 03:52 PM
Illein, on 26 December 2012 - 11:46 AM, said:
Sidenote to the OP: Don't forget the listing fee, so even if you get it in a couple of weeks - you'll probably have to farm some hundred G more just to list it.
I already have the listing fee and then some, so no worries there
#17
Posted 27 December 2012 - 03:06 PM
Gilles VI, on 26 December 2012 - 03:41 PM, said:
#18
Posted 28 December 2012 - 12:19 PM
atreoo, on 27 December 2012 - 03:06 PM, said:
The issue is, after acquiring one of the 4 legendaries I want - it's not a journey, it's a teleport and you're really just engineering the device that gets you there for months on end as you are at one point when you start - you remain at that point the entire course of your grinding and BAM then your body dissolves and you find yourself re-ensembled at a whole different place with a new legendary in hand.
Wish it were more like a journey... give me my legendary quest chain already, Anet! Then you can justify making them all soulbound on acquire, if you refuse to make them accountbound - but they certainly shouldn't be bind on equip.
Edited by Illein, 30 December 2012 - 09:49 AM.
#19
Posted 30 December 2012 - 06:03 AM
Illein, on 28 December 2012 - 12:19 PM, said:
Wish it were more like a journey... give me my legendary quest chain already, Anet! Then you can justify making them all soulbound on acquire, if you refuse to make them accountbound - but they certainly shouldn't be bind on equip.
I shed a tear, this is beautiful and true.
#20
Posted 31 December 2012 - 02:21 AM
That said, a Shortbow is a staple in the majority of builds that can use them, whereas something like Bolt (sword) is only really used selectively amongst the 5 professions capable of using them, so take suggestions with a pinch of salt.
EDIT: Yes, they should be bind on acquire. Legendaries can be perceived as a method to "sell" Karma.
Edited by Xephenon, 31 December 2012 - 02:22 AM.
#21
Posted 31 December 2012 - 04:07 AM
Trei, on 26 December 2012 - 03:04 AM, said:
Or are they already?
Weapons of Legends do not end up on some mere marketplace.
Does anet realize the message it is sending here?
It's a freaking cosmetic. And it's a casual game. Why not?
#22
Posted 31 December 2012 - 04:33 AM
omar316, on 31 December 2012 - 04:07 AM, said:
"Why not" indeed.
Since right now, my impression of someone with a legendary is basically a terrific farmer.
I suppose it really makes not a whole lot of difference whether this someone farmed/bought the mats to make one himself, or farmed/bought the gold to buy one outright.
Either way, prestige value = 0.
#24
Posted 31 December 2012 - 04:49 AM
We have the first type that is skill-based; one that has such an item must have displayed exceptional skills in the game, to overcome difficult challenges that cannot be accomplished by time commitment alone etc.
Then we have the purely awesome looking ones that are prestigious simply because one looks godly just wearing them. By nature, no sane developer would grant such aesthetics via level 1 critters, so rarity is implied by default.
None of the legendaries fall into the above categories, except maybe the twin greatswords.
#25
Posted 01 January 2013 - 03:08 AM
#26
Posted 01 January 2013 - 03:15 AM
Trei, on 31 December 2012 - 04:49 AM, said:
To talk about prestigious gear in GW2 is laughable at most. First you have exotics that everyone can obtain so easily they should probably just be rares and rares should be exotics. They hand these things out like they are water to say you have exotic gear is to say you have spent around a month playing the game hit level 80 and grabbed your free exotics. Now legendarys are better than exotics, oh wait no their stats are the same they just have effects and purple text that no one ever sees since there is no inspect feature. Now regardless of the stats to say you have a legendary means you either started when the game launched and got a precurser at 60g, you have far too much time on your hands or you bought gold and purchased everything. Personally I don't consider a legendary to be prestigious at all it just means you have/had gold or can grind boring stuff which a monkey could pull off.
So let's not bring up prestige in guild wars.
#27
Posted 02 January 2013 - 03:04 AM
Trei, on 31 December 2012 - 04:49 AM, said:
We have the first type that is skill-based; one that has such an item must have displayed exceptional skills in the game, to overcome difficult challenges that cannot be accomplished by time commitment alone etc.
Then we have the purely awesome looking ones that are prestigious simply because one looks godly just wearing them. By nature, no sane developer would grant such aesthetics via level 1 critters, so rarity is implied by default.
None of the legendaries fall into the above categories, except maybe the twin greatswords.
If RNG is skill yeah, its prestige alright.
Hopefully we can see the price drop enough so people can just buy a legendary for $50 real cash or something.
#28
Posted 02 January 2013 - 05:24 AM
Trei, on 31 December 2012 - 04:49 AM, said:
We have the first type that is skill-based; one that has such an item must have displayed exceptional skills in the game, to overcome difficult challenges that cannot be accomplished by time commitment alone etc.
Then we have the purely awesome looking ones that are prestigious simply because one looks godly just wearing them. By nature, no sane developer would grant such aesthetics via level 1 critters, so rarity is implied by default.
None of the legendaries fall into the above categories, except maybe the twin greatswords.
What does fall in the first category tho? I haven't seen an item yet that shows "skill." Dedication, sure. Big pockets, sure. But not skill. Well, Arah was "kinda" hard i guess.. But they messed that up with the token farm expoits so most people assume that someone with Arah gear/weapons simply farmed the first 2 bosses over and over again. >.>
The only thing that shows that a player is competent in the game is a PvP title imo. And even then, only tournaments related titles would fall in that category.
#29
Posted 02 January 2013 - 06:53 AM
IDarko, on 02 January 2013 - 05:24 AM, said:
The only thing that shows that a player is competent in the game is a PvP title imo. And even then, only tournaments related titles would fall in that category.
I was talking about it in a general sense, not specifically in gw2.
I agree with your view about pvp titles.
Unfortunately, other than introducing specific personal pve instances of high difficulty, I can't think of other ways to award such prestige in pve that would be inline with gw2 philosophy.
What anet has evidently chose to implement is the latter category of cool looking legendary gear.
But the problem is... Most of them simply aren't awesome looking enough either.
At the end of the day though, I'm beginning to question just what prestige is, despite these two categories I previously mentioned.
In the real world, prestige IS undeniably linked with money after all.
Is the guy driving a Lamborghini definitely a pro driver?
No, he is probably just rich.
How rare must an item be to be prestigious?
Its hard to admit, but its entirely likely I'm just being an envious sour little bunch of purple fruit used to make wine*.
* (Thanks censorship, brilliant)
Edited by Trei, 02 January 2013 - 07:07 AM.
#30
Posted 02 January 2013 - 07:05 AM
Trei, on 02 January 2013 - 06:53 AM, said:
I was talking about it in a general sense, not specifically in gw2.
I agree with your view about pvp titles.
Unfortunately, other than introducing specific personal pve instances of high difficulty, I can't think of other ways to award such prestige in pve that would be inline with gw2 philosophy.
What anet has evidently chose to implement is the latter category of cool looking legendary gear.
But the problem is... Most of them simply aren't awesome looking enough either.
At the end of the day though, I'm beginning to question just what prestige is, despite these two categories I previously mentioned.
In the real world, prestige IS undeniably linked with money after all.
Is the guy driving a Lamborghini definitely a pro driver?
No, he is probably just rich.
How rare must an item be to be prestigious?
Rarity has got no link to how prestigious an item is, but you are correct, usually rare items are prestigious.
For example before nerfs and shit, sacking a capital city in WAR and getting loot from the end bosses was almost impossible, bugs and exploits aside.
Before the 2nd nerf, you see some one in freaking city gear and he was like looked upon with awe. Some looked like crap but were still awesome.
You needed a 6 man to complete ToVL a 8 boss dungeon to be able to spawn a WB and need at least 12 people to kill it, and boss scales with more people in area. Though the loot's stat was mid tier, it was rare to see anyone with WB items. If only there were no stats attached to it, and the we had less carebears it woulda been awesome.
GW2 = who has the most gold to RNG their legendary.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









