Buying new laptop--will this be fine?
#1
Posted 27 December 2012 - 05:42 PM
Acer Aspire V3-571G-6407 15.6-Inch
Windows 8
Intel Core i5 3210M 2.5 GHz (3 MB Cache)
4 GB SDRAM
500 GB 5400 rpm Hard Drive
15.6-Inch Screen
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
1366 x 768 pixels
I think the RPM is lower than recommended(?), but honestly I don't mind waiting 5 seconds longer on load screens, if that's the only drawback. This laptop would exclusively be used for gaming since I use something else for school/work so I won't be doing anything crazy like running 20 programs at once and multi-tasking.
Basically, how will it fair for GW2?
#2
Posted 27 December 2012 - 05:45 PM
http://www.notebookc...0M.63761.0.html
Edit. wrong link. scrool down for GW2 info
Edited by kaldemeo, 27 December 2012 - 05:46 PM.
#3
Posted 27 December 2012 - 07:21 PM
I know that the game also depends on CPU so I was hoping that the i5 processor would help achieve this setting?
#4
Posted 27 December 2012 - 09:43 PM
#5
Posted 28 December 2012 - 05:33 PM
#6
Posted 28 December 2012 - 05:39 PM
WvW however ... not terrible, but when you get more than 20+ players in front of you, it's hell. ~15FPS and less.
#7
Posted 28 December 2012 - 10:47 PM
Edited by mamaral, 28 December 2012 - 10:47 PM.
#8
Posted 28 December 2012 - 11:32 PM
mamaral, on 28 December 2012 - 10:47 PM, said:
Edited by Zerk2012, 28 December 2012 - 11:34 PM.
#9
Posted 29 December 2012 - 08:08 AM
Edited by mamaral, 29 December 2012 - 07:21 PM.
#10
Posted 29 December 2012 - 07:26 PM
mamaral, on 29 December 2012 - 08:08 AM, said:
If you want highish settings, an i7-3630qm (ideally a 3940xm) and a GTX680m or HD7970m are your best bet. Yes, the CPU makes that much of a difference, with a 680m on best appearance preset, it takes a quad core to go over 30fps and even a 3840qm will give better performance over a 3740qm.
EDIT: At 1920x1080 that is, lower resolutions will require less from your CPU.
Edited by tijo, 29 December 2012 - 07:28 PM.
#11
Posted 29 December 2012 - 07:38 PM
#12
Posted 29 December 2012 - 09:41 PM
tijo, on 29 December 2012 - 07:26 PM, said:
EDIT: At 1920x1080 that is, lower resolutions will require less from your CPU.
Thanks for explaining! Makes sense now.
And I can't get a desktop because there isn't really any room in my apartment to put it (NYC) and I don't have a desk.
I ended up getting a different, but very similar laptop (it has GT 635m instead of 630 graphic card). Thanks for all the info and input!
#13
Posted 30 December 2012 - 01:51 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









