Do you think those same people would call AJ "the best" and "unbiased" if he had put GW2 at, say, #5? I personally feel it's well below Dishonored and Far Cry 3, although I see where he would think GW2 provides the best value for the money (play time to money spent ratio). But if we're going to put such a high emphasis on value, Planetside 2 should easily be ahead of GW2, or at least right there next to it. Far Cry 3 would easily be ahead of it as well (I've logged almost as much time in it as I have in GW2 and I'm still only halfway through).
No it's because if there's one issue (or several in some cases) with a game that hurts its long term success for a casual player, he's narrowed in on it far better than most higher paid Reviwers ever could... And no I don't agree with him putting GW2 @ #1 if that helps your own obvious Bias rest at ease a little better...
So what exactly makes AJ more "fair" and "unbiased" than other reviewers according to these people, other than the fact that he happened to put their favorite game at #1?
Edited by Treble, 02 January 2013 - 05:07 PM.