Jump to content

  • Curse Sites
Help

kingkillar

Member Since 21 Apr 2012
Offline Last Active Mar 17 2013 11:57 PM

#2035024 Thief solo unupgraded supply camp

Posted Venereus on 22 October 2012 - 03:40 PM

View PostWordsworth, on 21 October 2012 - 10:20 PM, said:

Anything wipes the floor with basic camps.

View Posttallanx, on 22 October 2012 - 01:47 AM, said:

you don't really need to be a thief to do that.

View PostDarknicrofia, on 22 October 2012 - 07:19 AM, said:

pretty much any class can solo unupgraded camps

View PostOrikx, on 22 October 2012 - 03:30 PM, said:

I'm not sure what this video is trying to show. I don't play a thief but see nothing wrong with that. Is there any class that can't solo an un-upgraded camp? I'm pretty sure I was able to solo them before hitting lvl 80 even.

Sweeping statements are so much fun, until someone that actually knows what he's talking about shows up. Soloing camps is useless if you can't do it fast. Thief does it fast and also has the tools to get away if it comes to that, all in the same build. Also, no, not every class can do it because for some the needed build gimps you in other situations, so it's not worth it. Thanks for trying.


#2149483 Farewell from Jedahs of [MERC]

Posted Leyana on 23 January 2013 - 10:15 PM

"I'm quitting" threads do not belong on these forums. Guru is not your personal blog and no one here is famous enough to warrant a thread like this. If you really are that famous, you leaving the game would have appeared in the News section.

Thanks.


#2134140 So it seems a lot of naughty boys and girls got one last gift from Santa this...

Posted turbo234 on 03 January 2013 - 10:33 AM

Seriously? If it breaks the game don't do it. It's really not that hard of a concept to grasp people.


#2145773 Upcoming AoE skill balancing (nerf)

Posted lollasaurus on 18 January 2013 - 09:21 PM

Breaking something that works fine.. again


#2144685 WarMachine looking for alliances

Posted GrandmaFunk on 17 January 2013 - 04:52 PM

then take a look at Kaineng's matches since their "journey" began.

there's nothing heroic about dropping down to blow out servers that have 1/10th the population.


#2141427 Server hopping is still an issue

Posted ZCKS on 13 January 2013 - 02:53 PM

I'm alright with free transfers but there should be more restrictions

things like


1: Two month cool down on sever transfers. Can be halved if the player pays 1500 gems.

2: Cannot transfer to a server your current server is matched up against this week or will be next week (last part dependent on weather or not it's clear your server will be facing them)

This would get rid of allot of the problems caused by entire guilds transfering on a weekly bases & as a plus if a guild just has to transfer then arena.net is going to make a sizable profit.


#2141235 Server hopping is still an issue

Posted The Shadow on 13 January 2013 - 05:38 AM

View PostSaint Scarlet, on 12 January 2013 - 09:39 AM, said:

What happened was we got fed up of Gandara keep qqing us and telling us they're the best. This week is the 1st time we have had every single guild back in action since 2 weeks before xmas. So we decided to show you just why we got to T3 with our guilds. We play well together and all set out at reset to show you what you've been missing. We had RG return to us this week after spending a week on your server and sIN join us too, thats around 60-70 people in total that joined/will join(and they're not all here yet but thats the size of their guilds together). We don't want bandwagoners to join because it will kill the way we play as guilds so means we'd end up losing ground rather than doing well.

You guys are lame.

Server hopping is lame.

You are ruining WvW for every single server you face in the lower-tiers that have absolutely no chance. It's like a 5 v 1. And you have the audacity to boast about that? To say you want to prove to everyone how "good" your guilds are?

That doesn't make you good.

It's lame. It's pathetic.

You are proving nothing other than you ran out of steam.. are lame and just can't handle T1-2 for any length of time.

I have less respect for you than the gang-banging french from Viz and Arbor.


#2135200 New maps for WvW on the way?

Posted Voradors on 04 January 2013 - 02:50 PM

View PostQuietnine, on 04 January 2013 - 01:18 AM, said:

Things and stuff and /rant

Oh, i guess those are rose colored glasses on your avatar ;)
Its easy to look back on and old game and remember all the good things, forget its flaws, and call out a newer game for not being exactly like your fond memories.

DAoC had its flaws, GW2 has its flaws.   Overall, both were/are very good games in their own rights.  
This is GW2s first attempt at WvW/RvR battles as far as i can tell, and i think it was a pretty decent one.  DAoC was Mythic's 2nd (or 3rd depending on how you want to view Darkness Falls 1), so they had time to tweak things, learn from their mistakes and improve.

So, in short, not every game is a carbon copy.  Things change.  Recommend fixes for problems that allow GW2 to be its own thing, and not a copy of DAoC.  Things will hopefully get better.
ANet tried something, didnt get it perfect and will work on improving it.  Thats how things develop.....  (that they worked on PvE first, i dont like....but completely understand)

Oh and half the time i didnt know who was giving me run speed in DAoC either, just a "Bard LFG".


#2134755 New maps for WvW on the way?

Posted CalmLittleBuddy on 04 January 2013 - 12:28 AM

View PostQuietnine, on 03 January 2013 - 10:14 PM, said:

as some have already suggested (OP), creating map imbalance that favors the underdogs would be interesting. ontop of that, maps dont have to be one trick ponies. you could have a perma-dark area in an otherwise day/night cycle map, or a heavily wooded area in an otherwise open map. a section of the map that is a grand abandoned city.

right now, players arent actually running around looking for other players to kill. they are running around flipping camps, towers, etc, and the only time they run into the enemy is when one of them is beating on some door, and the enemy team decides that structure is worth enough points to bother defending. that is assbackwards. we should be running around looking to kill eachother to brag in eachothers faces (and gtfo out of here with this nameless invader bs) and only taking structures as an insult to the enemy when the enemy is refusing to come out and play.

Thats sPvP dude. WvW is about objectives. I always look to kill folks everywhere anyways. Open ened killing with no forts would be zerg vs zerg. Objectives offer some protection for undermanned forces. WvW is not kill centric. If it were, there'd be player ranks.


#2134000 New maps for WvW on the way?

Posted Ramanadjinn on 03 January 2013 - 03:35 AM

That map severely disadvantages the green team.

Am I wrong in thinking that would actually just prevent green from accruing as many points as they could in an even matchup.  Wouldn't this make matches more stale as green would rarely be able to move up a tier from such a disadvantaged position, even when they are ready to move.

Not only that but it would be that much easier for red to just hold out on defense while green and blue fight giving red the ability to sit in a tier longer than maybe they should.

I could be wrong, but I would imagine that would lead to tiers sitting with the same server for an extremely long period of time.


#2131412 Prevent pets from damaging downed players.

Posted UssjTrunks on 30 December 2012 - 07:47 AM

Rangers are basically free kills in this game. Stop complaining.


#2129982 Prevent pets from damaging downed players.

Posted Gilles VI on 28 December 2012 - 03:21 PM

Yes lets just remove all differences professions have.
And then complain all professions feel so homogenised

*genius* :P

@OP, I think it's one the few things where ranger has an advantage, let them have it.
If you lose a 1v1 vs a ranger you deserve to get killed.


#2131843 Tired of NA WvW? Move to EU Servers!

Posted Junglizm on 30 December 2012 - 11:48 PM

View PostKillminusnine, on 28 December 2012 - 03:41 AM, said:

Lol, they transferred down to beat up on super casuals.  Why would other guilds do that.

Spoken like a true bandwagonner.

Probably don't list your server because its your 4th or 5th transfer now since release?

T1 and T2 aren't about skill or tactics, they are about numbers and coverage.

Every lower tier has just as much skill and tactics to go around relative to their size as any T1 server.

War Machine chose to stand alone, I wouldn't expect a bandwaggoner like yourself to even begin to understand that.


#2121261 WvW Rankings for December 14th

Posted GrandmaFunk on 17 December 2012 - 10:12 PM

View PostBina, on 17 December 2012 - 10:08 PM, said:

3rd place should always move down a tier, 1st should always move up a tier, NA have the same matches week after week is weak.

the stagnation of the tiers is a sign that the rankings are actually balancing out and servers are fighting against the servers most likely to offer them a quality match.


#2112368 WvW Rankings for December 7th & New Culling Trial Introduced

Posted Gecko on 08 December 2012 - 11:33 PM

Sounds like a good temporary solution.

Bloodtau, which part of "this is a test" and "we are very interested in your feedback" do you think indicate that they close their eyes?