kingkillar

Wordsworth, on 21 October 2012 - 10:20 PM, said:

tallanx, on 22 October 2012 - 01:47 AM, said:

Darknicrofia, on 22 October 2012 - 07:19 AM, said:

Orikx, on 22 October 2012 - 03:30 PM, said:

Sweeping statements are so much fun, until someone that actually knows what he's talking about shows up. Soloing camps is useless if you can't do it fast. Thief does it fast and also has the tools to get away if it comes to that, all in the same build. Also, no, not every class can do it because for some the needed build gimps you in other situations, so it's not worth it. Thanks for trying.

I've seen it written in this thread multiple times that crafting is useless and a money sink. You guys must be playing a different game then me... I make 10-15g a day by buying things off the TP, crafting and then selling the final product. There are currently over 500 items that you can craft for a profit.

For all those saying GW2 has the worst economy in all the games they've played, I'm guessing they can't have played too many MMOs.

It's not difficult to max out your gear with the current market. Or to max out crafting.

This would be a problem in most MMOs.

Krazzar, on 20 January 2013 - 04:40 AM, said:

The other questions that needs to be asked is what are you winning?

Perm Shadow Form, on 19 January 2013 - 02:03 PM, said:

How would that fix anything?

If you want to 'fix' an economy you need to adjust gold sinks, drop rates,...

"I'm quitting" threads do not belong on these forums. Guru is not your personal blog and no one here is famous enough to warrant a thread like this. If you really are that famous, you leaving the game would have appeared in the News section.

Thanks.

Seriously? If it breaks the game don't do it. It's really not that hard of a concept to grasp people.

Breaking something that works fine.. again

then take a look at Kaineng's matches since their "journey" began.

there's nothing heroic about dropping down to blow out servers that have 1/10th the population.

I'm alright with free transfers but there should be more restrictions

things like


1: Two month cool down on sever transfers. Can be halved if the player pays 1500 gems.

2: Cannot transfer to a server your current server is matched up against this week or will be next week (last part dependent on weather or not it's clear your server will be facing them)

This would get rid of allot of the problems caused by entire guilds transfering on a weekly bases & as a plus if a guild just has to transfer then arena.net is going to make a sizable profit.

Saint Scarlet, on 12 January 2013 - 09:39 AM, said:

You guys are lame.

Server hopping is lame.

You are ruining WvW for every single server you face in the lower-tiers that have absolutely no chance. It's like a 5 v 1. And you have the audacity to boast about that? To say you want to prove to everyone how "good" your guilds are?

That doesn't make you good.

It's lame. It's pathetic.

You are proving nothing other than you ran out of steam.. are lame and just can't handle T1-2 for any length of time.

I have less respect for you than the gang-banging french from Viz and Arbor.

Quietnine, on 04 January 2013 - 01:18 AM, said:

Oh, i guess those are rose colored glasses on your avatar
Its easy to look back on and old game and remember all the good things, forget its flaws, and call out a newer game for not being exactly like your fond memories.

DAoC had its flaws, GW2 has its flaws.   Overall, both were/are very good games in their own rights.  
This is GW2s first attempt at WvW/RvR battles as far as i can tell, and i think it was a pretty decent one.  DAoC was Mythic's 2nd (or 3rd depending on how you want to view Darkness Falls 1), so they had time to tweak things, learn from their mistakes and improve.

So, in short, not every game is a carbon copy.  Things change.  Recommend fixes for problems that allow GW2 to be its own thing, and not a copy of DAoC.  Things will hopefully get better.
ANet tried something, didnt get it perfect and will work on improving it.  Thats how things develop.....  (that they worked on PvE first, i dont like....but completely understand)

Oh and half the time i didnt know who was giving me run speed in DAoC either, just a "Bard LFG".

Quietnine, on 03 January 2013 - 10:14 PM, said:

Thats sPvP dude. WvW is about objectives. I always look to kill folks everywhere anyways. Open ened killing with no forts would be zerg vs zerg. Objectives offer some protection for undermanned forces. WvW is not kill centric. If it were, there'd be player ranks.

That map severely disadvantages the green team.

Am I wrong in thinking that would actually just prevent green from accruing as many points as they could in an even matchup.  Wouldn't this make matches more stale as green would rarely be able to move up a tier from such a disadvantaged position, even when they are ready to move.

Not only that but it would be that much easier for red to just hold out on defense while green and blue fight giving red the ability to sit in a tier longer than maybe they should.

I could be wrong, but I would imagine that would lead to tiers sitting with the same server for an extremely long period of time.

Rangers are basically free kills in this game. Stop complaining.