Jump to content

  • Curse Sites
Help

Dosearius

Member Since 24 Apr 2012
Offline Last Active May 14 2013 12:24 AM

#2192908 Game Exploit Closed

Posted Gilles VI on 18 April 2013 - 01:22 PM

View PostP4ndora, on 18 April 2013 - 11:58 AM, said:

Whatever this exploit was, soon the banned players will start to QQ on forums that they didn't know it was an exploit.

Yea and then some other people (you know who I talk about) will proclaim it wasn't the player their fault, but Anets fault by not being clear what is an exploit and what not.


#1654083 Hope for any Linux gamers?

Posted Abbadoom on 30 July 2012 - 01:48 PM

View PostI swung 4 times, on 30 July 2012 - 09:01 AM, said:

What's a Linux? ;-)

It's one of the Ranger's pets. :)


#2178958 Too Many Waypoints

Posted Al Shamari on 14 March 2013 - 12:36 AM

All the comments in this thread about adding more waypoints, it's obvious that people are just begging for "Easy Mode" which is quite a shame. They want loot and they want to be able to get it in the easiest, quickest way possible. This is obvious from the replies in this thread, as well as the formation of Warrior/Guardian/Mesmer only "speed clear" groups. That's probably the direction this game will go, whether we like it or not.


#2173284 Exposing the Truth, Past and Present.

Posted Azure Skye on 01 March 2013 - 06:45 PM

i was going to write a long post but that won't do it justice,  you can't please everyone, its a nearly f'in impossible.


#2165356 So quiet now...

Posted Cures on 17 February 2013 - 11:24 AM

the game is obviously dying. only 10 min queue to LA and about 1k people at every event. so sad :P


#2165267 So quiet now...

Posted Trei on 17 February 2013 - 03:15 AM

Almost agreed with OP... then I realise I was in an overflow.

Again.


#2168297 Bag and Bank Slot Sale

Posted Kurosov on 21 February 2013 - 09:53 PM

View PostDarkobra, on 21 February 2013 - 09:47 PM, said:

Why does this require a client download? I thought the gem store was handled at their end?

probably because these are the only two things that are purchased from the actual game interface rather than the gem store.


#2154302 World Vs World Rating Reset Incoming

Posted CalmLittleBuddy on 30 January 2013 - 01:25 PM

Week 1 after reset - Just like normal, match ups based on the scores and ratings from the previous week.

Week 2 - Highest point differential will end up in T1 first over all. ANY server from ANY tier can end up here if they have the highest point differential. Weird matchups and complete imbalanced tiers

Week 3 - Closer to normal, due to high population tiers blowing out their competition in the lower brackets.

Week 4 - Pretty much sorted. Business as usual.

Week 5 and beyond will settle back into ratings torpor, with the same match ups lasting months.

That's one month or utter turmoil to end up right where we are today. While I personally look forward to this, it is pointless because the problem they are addressing would largely solve itself in a month anyways.

I like the idea just because it's going to be wild, but to me this is a WvW PR stunt to drive more players into WvW and keep folks tuned in until the February update. WvW populations were declining as of January 1. So...

FREE TRANSFERS ENDING!!! People transfer like mad and enter WvW again causing queues and raised profile of WvW in general.

RESET!!! Again, raise the profile of WvW and get folks playing.

UPDATE!!! Drive players to WvW for new shiny!

Again, I'm almost exclusively WvW, so to me, this is great, but let's call it what it is. A gimmick.


#2154491 New Rewards and the Achievements System

Posted Dirame on 30 January 2013 - 04:42 PM

View PostAlex Dimitri, on 30 January 2013 - 04:00 PM, said:

Am I the only one that think these Laurel (s) are kind of lame ?
I mean i checked prices on rings & amulet (ascended) and they are like 30-35 Laurel, so since i don`t do Fractals (because i hate levels and endless pursuit for party) i will need just 3 months to get rings and amulet ? ! ?

I`m sorry but at this pace for full Ascended gear i will need no less than 1 year, correct me if i`m wrong but this sounds BAD.
And since i have 8 characters (and let`s just say i wanna play at least 4 of them) what are my options exactly ?
Or maybe i should just pick one and "try" to gear that one ?

I HOPE Anet is not dead set on their Laurel "reward" system, because this is gonna be even worse then obtaining Legendary !

Hey, you've been doing alright without doing fractals so far so, why are you complaining?


#2151086 Why do people want mounts?

Posted Trei on 26 January 2013 - 01:22 AM

View PostAstalnar, on 25 January 2013 - 04:15 PM, said:

Because fast travel is costly and mounts are low maintenance. And they look cool.
What if mounts are implemented with high maintenance in the form of needing to stable them in towns or feed them regularly, and not as a Dragonball capsule ride you just pull out of your bag?

Would you still want these mounts?

No, you just want free transportation.


#2149854 So it seems a lot of naughty boys and girls got one last gift from Santa this...

Posted Gli on 24 January 2013 - 01:19 PM

I'm sorry, but I find your stance on eliminating people's responsibility for their own actions ridiculous.

Also, your stance on the acceptable number of bugs is ridiculous. But given that that's how you feel, what are you going to do about it?


#2149602 January WvW Culling and Load Changes

Posted dannywolt on 24 January 2013 - 02:14 AM

View Postkidawk, on 24 January 2013 - 02:00 AM, said:

Quite a bit of flip flopping from ANet lately. First they say no ascended item additions in 2013. Then it is revealed that ascended amulets will be attainable in the coming Jan. patch.

Source? I distinctly recall A-Net saying no new gear tier in 2013 and that Ascended gear would be rolled out throughout 2013.


#2149477 January WvW Culling and Load Changes

Posted MrZero on 23 January 2013 - 10:09 PM

View PostLurker14ownz, on 23 January 2013 - 08:58 PM, said:

Great news! Some may flame about seeing fallback models but it is WAYYY better than having a zerg of 50+ all of a sudden appear all around you.

I could care less what enemy players model looks like. It's not like I stand there and admire their gear. Kind of have better shit to do when they are in my face. Right?


#2149483 Farewell from Jedahs of [MERC]

Posted Leyana on 23 January 2013 - 10:15 PM

"I'm quitting" threads do not belong on these forums. Guru is not your personal blog and no one here is famous enough to warrant a thread like this. If you really are that famous, you leaving the game would have appeared in the News section.

Thanks.


#2144704 So it seems a lot of naughty boys and girls got one last gift from Santa this...

Posted Trei on 17 January 2013 - 05:23 PM

View Postraspberry jam, on 17 January 2013 - 04:25 PM, said:

Of course they did. If you hand out sticks of dynamite to everyone, it's quite obvious that some of them will blow shit up.
No one handed out anything.
Anet did not deliberately create the bug nor announce the exploit to tempt everyone into exploiting it.

View PostShiren, on 17 January 2013 - 04:53 PM, said:

Most of the exploiters that were banned were people who used them for themselves. ArenaNet even said most of the ecto never entered the economy.They weren't affecting other people by flooding the economy, ectos were created and then turned into ascended gear. Most of them weren't interacting or impacting on the rights or treatment of other players by doing this. So no, it doesn't get applied directly and you seriously underestimate the difference between bypassing the economy for personal gain (bypassing, not exploiting) and saying a company can treat it's consumers however they want regardless of the details or consequences because it doesn't impact on or interest you.

This is one of those forum discussions where you know no matter how much you talk at people, all you are doing is talking at them. Once someone decides the rights of other people have no value to them (think of that in context of any other situation) there's really no point giving them the respect of a discussion, it's a lost cause at that point.
Yeah... for themselves.
Self.

Anyway, where can I find this excerpt of what you claim Anet said?
Not that it changes anything much, but I just want to read it in its original context.

Sorry, no one has the right to exploit the game.

View Postraspberry jam, on 17 January 2013 - 04:33 PM, said:

Yes, bugs exist and should be fixed. But just as the (moral) responsibility of fixing the bug hangs on the developer, so does the effects that the bug caused.
The bug would have cause nothing much if no one exploited it.
The harmful effects came from the exploiters' actions with it.