- Viewing Profile: Likes: DarkGanni
DarkGanni
Member Since 27 Apr 2012Offline Last Active May 16 2013 09:46 PM
Community Stats
- Group Members
- Active Posts 142
- Profile Views 738
- Member Title Asuran Acolyte
- Age Age Unknown
- Birthday Birthday Unknown
-
Gender
Not Telling
Contact Information
#2200595 Why hasn't Anet addressed the current zerker or gtfo pve endgame?
Posted
FoxBat
on 10 May 2013 - 11:59 AM
This attitude towards "hardcore" PvE content really shouldn't surprise anyone considering this is the company that gave us Shadow Form. Though I have to say I'd take the GW2 meta over actual optimal GW1 dungeon builds, at least you have to worry about responding to big boss attacks rather than holding down the "I win" button.
#2202546 On Lottery (RNG) Boxes
Posted
zwei2stein
on 16 May 2013 - 02:56 PM
Guardian of the Light, on 16 May 2013 - 10:44 AM, said:
I feel this is relevant to the whole RNG chest thing everyone complains about (especially the first half). You all ask why couldn't Anet simply put these items directly in the gem store instead of sticking them in random boxes. Well the answer is simply because it's less financially viable to put them there and they experimented by how much when they released rox and Braham's weapons in the gem store and compared to the box sales for fused weapon tickets and found that RNG chests earn a lot more money.
Maybe they shoud have given Rox and Braham greatswords.
Shield, Mace and Bow which not even all classes can equip and which are not exactly the most popular weapons can not be indication.
Compare them to being able to obtain weapon that you can and want to actually wield with your character and build.
#2199312 How well do you think the GW2 story compares to the GW1 story?
Posted
Ritualist
on 07 May 2013 - 02:27 PM
Honestly, I only followed the story up to lvl 10 and then I simply got tired of having to constantly jump back and forth to follow it. Don't get me wrong, I quite disliked Factions' closed gates, but as Prophecies shows, there's a happy medium where you can give players the freedom to do their own thing, but still keep them engaged in the story.
#2199355 How well do you think the GW2 story compares to the GW1 story?
Posted
rukia
on 07 May 2013 - 03:44 PM
#2196774 Gamasutra - Pre-End-Game Economy Screwed Up
Posted
Eon Lilu
on 30 April 2013 - 10:38 AM
#2197074 Is the April 30th Update "make or break"?
Posted
Susanoh
on 30 April 2013 - 10:24 PM
ShezuTsukai, on 30 April 2013 - 09:13 PM, said:
Not everyone who stops playing the game "rage quits." Some play other games, or go about the rest of their lives. Is it also karma for these players?
Not to mention, if those who did, as you put it, "rage quit," left because of a lack of new content, and the return to see that much of the content added was just temporary distractions and people are doing the same old stuff they were doing when they left, it sort of validates their reasons for leaving in the first place.
#2196439 Is the April 30th Update "make or break"?
Posted
Traveller
on 29 April 2013 - 03:24 PM
#2193936 The main game is good, however what about the social aspect?
Posted
Longasc
on 22 April 2013 - 05:42 AM
GW2 was meant to be an "action" MMO. Always moving, clicking, few buttons to press and easy to get into.
This design idea has been realized. Definitely! But at what expense?
I also always wondered if GW2 designers had a "jumping trauma" from GW1 given how many jumping puzzles the game has. (Newsflash, ArenaNet, are you really sure MMO gamers are platformer game fans?)
But maybe it dates back to the core inspiration of its design. The desire to make MMOs more action oriented.
There is the problem: These 8-bit era platform or whatever games have little to do with MMO gaming. You cannot help people much if at all in a jumping puzzle. Either it's you who falls down and has to jump all of it again or the other, not much chance to help or cooperate except for killing some mobs.
I am also a bit worried that the exploration content is such a solo jumping affair.
Unfortunately ArenaNet lost people like Jeff Strain and some others. Colin Johanson created the GW1 Bonus Mission Pack, and this is where it started going down this wrong GW2 lane: It was very fun - but only once, twice and when people got their weapon skin of choice, they never went back. Unfortunately many hearts and events in GW2 are auto-attack clickfests and even the more difficult ones later are AoE mass zerg orgies (Balthazar Temple e.g.). The lower level bosses die so fast that one realizes that down/upscaling of player level has its limitations.
GW2's combat is fast paced and leaves little time for communication. I can type while fighting, most can't. There is no downtime after a fight, people go on into the next fight. Again no communication. You are alone. Your heart progress only counts for you, not for people in your party if you are in a party. Mobs and mob number adjust to you if you are solo or two, three players.
Guild Bounties etc. are quite social, their implementation is rather flawed though. The UI for them is hidden in the Guild Interface and they are not that "dynamic", fixed routes for every bounty.
Now take a look at the living story. Were you rocked by it so far? 10 minutes with Braham and Rox, then it's some generic events and scavenger hunts for weeks.
I took a break of some 3 months and recently got back into GW2. It's a beautiful game but I am sad to say it's fundamentally flawed and I doubt this can be fixed other than creating GW3. I read that no expansions are planned for the next time, so it is up to improved living story bits and... whatever... to keep us going.
I hope they do better than I fear, as the player churn of GW2 is enormous. I have seen guilds of 200-400 peeps go down to 2-3 players online, 1 of them maybe something one could consider "active". After 3 months many seem to be done with the game. I am not sure if many of them return like me.
P.S.: Guesting and Servers. This is also what destroyed and splintered the international GW1 community. Guesting is such a PITA, switch chars and don't forget to guest again, limit of 2 servers, most abuse it only for event farming oh my. Cannot visit American buddies anymore at all, not even for dungeon runs.
(off-topic but somehow nevertheless related: How would you continue developing GW2? If I would be given the task to expand on what's there, that's quite difficult. No wonder there is one jumping puzzle after another and a shallow story with the ever same events.)
#2177339 Guesting needs to be disabled and my idea below put in...
Posted
elmprotector
on 10 March 2013 - 06:42 PM
So block all guesting on servers. And then make a guesting server. If you want to play with friends guest to the guesting server which is not attached to any other server and play with friends.
Instances are working great. Instance dungeons do not mess with servers because they are outside the actual servers so leave them.
This game is about everyone having fun and not messing with other peoples fun. Well guesting as it is now is messing with people trying to events on there own servers because half the people at the event are guesting from another server!
So I think my idea will make it so everyone can play with friends WITHOUT SCREWING OTHER PLAYERS OVER IN THE PROCESS.
What do you all think?
#2146191 GW2 worst mmo economy ever?
Posted
Arquenya
on 19 January 2013 - 03:35 PM
#1895346 What do GW1 players think of GW2?
Posted
Dulu
on 07 September 2012 - 03:25 AM
Worse in every other regard. Although, WvW has a lot of potential.
#2169546 I'm trying really hard to like this game
Posted
Rukioish
on 24 February 2013 - 06:59 AM
#2169489 PvE bounty missions to require WvW guild levels
Posted
AKGeo
on 24 February 2013 - 03:00 AM
Azure Skye, on 24 February 2013 - 12:02 AM, said:
I haven't done that since my noobs days in GW1, when i didn't know where to look to get a price check. So thank you for misrepresenting me. Thank you, my good sir. =)
The point I'm making is that large guilds tend to attract the attention-seekers who can't go 30 seconds without saying something in guild chat, and gets upset if someone doesn't reply. That's not being social, that's being annoying. A guild with 5 actively regular players who get along and converse is plenty social. I don't need to wade through a bunch of tween BS in order to get my communication fix.
#2157883 xpac worth of content, so far
Posted
I'm Squirrel
on 04 February 2013 - 06:13 PM
Things they should work on ASAP: reduce # of servers drastically (6-9 per region), a real dedicated LFG tool
These two ideas should fix the community for now.
Additional content (events, missions, etc.) should be the least of their concern with player populations severely dwindling.
And let's be real tea. There's no point in extra content if the game is already dead, which it could be in a few months, if they don't make some drastic changes now.
#2165894 Should the cap have been level 20?
Posted
Zan7
on 18 February 2013 - 12:14 PM
- Viewing Profile: Likes: DarkGanni
- Privacy Policy
- Forum Rules & Guidelines ·

Find content