GrayGardner

Here's a hint: play a thief through 80 before making judgement. IMHO, hitting a target dummy does not seem to be a good testing method. My main is a warrior and I hated thiefs, so I decided to roll one. Yes they are a DPS class and hit hard, but they have very low armor and health. Game developer ruin games by listening to whiners. Hope Anet doesn't change a thing.

GrayGardner, on 09 October 2012 - 11:20 PM, said:

Edit: See video in first post now.

Slivers, on 10 October 2012 - 01:09 AM, said:

Rune of Soldier

Red_Falcon, on 24 September 2012 - 04:09 AM, said:

Translated: 'Hi, I'm an elitist &#% and instead of simply suggesting how I prefer my own builds to work, I'm going to tell you how all of you should do it and if you don't, you suck. It doesn't matter if YOU paid for YOUR game client, you have to build MY way or you suck!'

I think I'm going to do it the same way I have for the past decade+... play with traits until I find what works for ME and if you, or others, don't like it you can give me the $60 I paid or STFU

GrayGardner, on 23 September 2012 - 07:01 PM, said:

The skinniest body, average/medium seemed to fit a warrior more. I prefer to be light and agile like a sheet of tissue paper.

Features

• Recipe profit table.
  
• Trading post news scanner.
  
• Supply and demand graphs.
  
• Tooltips
  
• Gem/Silver exchange rate.
  
• Black market Gold/$ exchange rate
  
• Item languages in German, French, and Spanish.
  
• Website languages in German, French, Spanish, Russian, and simplified Chinese.

http://www.guildwarstrade.com

Aiendreas, on 23 September 2012 - 04:19 AM, said:

That set is spread out across pretty much every L25-40 zone. Kessek hills had all parts but recently the helmet has been changed for some reason to be a normal helmet and not that roman legionary look.

GrayGardner, on 22 September 2012 - 11:58 PM, said:

"Dark Armour" Chest and Pants from karma merchants in the Orr zones and human tier 2 cultural armour gloves, shoulders are from the "Banded" set, rares dropped around level 60-70. Not seen in the image are level 400 armoursmith boots while I continue the search for better looking ones.

No.

This is one of the biggest selling points of the game. Keep the structured/tournament style PvP its own entity and let it be based purely on skill. At no time can anyone lose and claim gear as the reason, etc. If your team wins in sPvP, you earned it through skill as a team, not have the "phat lewts".

If you want PvP using YOUR gear, go to WvW and do some small group roaming instead of following the zergs. Yes, you are given base level 80 stats, but you are nowhere near as powerful as a true level 80.

If I'm truly able to absorb myself into the game, I see my different characters as extensions of different emotions/attitudes/ideas of mine and my main as a more direct extension of myself as a whole.

DuskWolf, on 04 August 2012 - 03:55 AM, said:

Dude, there are enough nerd hierarchies in the nerd hierarchy. You do not need to make more by blanket dismissing people based on what races they play.

Some people like giant cats. Some people like plants. Some people like short nerdy folks. Some people like big vikings. And some people like playing humans. And then you iterate concepts from there.

The grizzled veteran Charr, who's fought many wars but still has some fire left in him; the newborn Sylvari who's overwhelmed at how vast, complicated and old everything about this world is; the Asura who's trying to come up with the next world-changing invention but is still just some unappreciated apprentice; the Norn who committed a shameful misstep so overcompensates by getting in over her head to try to pull off something to redeem her rep; the Human who wants to return glory to her people because of everything they've lost.

Go and read the character concept pages in the relevant sections in GW2RP; you'll see a ton of well-thought out concepts for each race. People are actually trying to think about these things, are actually reading the lore and wrangling out different concepts.

It seems the charr fans are a lot more vocal than the others. Either that or I just notice them more, because I will never forgive them for the Searing.






FOR ASCALON!

Nope. The appeal of Guild Wars is the lack of monthly fees. Always has been. I don't do monthly fees. I bought the game and that should be enough. Anything with monthly fees and I don't see a reason to eventually pay £200 for a game.

Herr Roy Raven, on 11 June 2012 - 03:45 PM, said:

Well, the difference in GW2 is:
"I swing a sword, I swung it again, hey hey! I swung it again! dodged."

Because I'm studying and shouldn't be here, I'm gonna keep it short: I played a decent amount of Guild Wars and even got to a 30/50 HoM and not once have I been in a serious PvP match. I just played PvE and was the best PvE I've played so far ... I don't think they can do much wrong with Guild Wars 2.

As a mainly PvE player, I'm planning on enjoying WvW and PvP too and I haven't seen any bad thing about one of the three game types so far in beta. On the other hand, I'm just a casual player that doesn't note ANY nerfes or changes if they appear. Oops, I have 1k less health ... a well, it just became more challenging