Actually based on much more reliable sources than some random slub on the internet Casey Hudson wouldn't not have had free hands with the ending, and would have been forced to take that bullet for EA. In fact the only person, ever, who seems to be saying otherwise is you. And as we just established; your argument is irrelevant.
And those more reliable sources are? Casey Hudson himself? Apparently not since he agrees with me.
[quote]Once the reaper has enough life force, they can transform into a devastating avatar of destruction that leaves enemies frozen in terror.[/quote]I know that this is standard fare in GW2, but what on earth led them to believe that this was a good idea to begin with?
Such is the nature of the internet. And such is my point. In all honesty do you honestly believe your argument SHOULD be given any extra weight whatsoever because you've "worked for an EA owned company" when you admit yourself that there is no way for you to validate that? Your claims of employment, however genuine, are completely irrelevant. And thus all you're doing by bringing them up is wasting everyone's time. Including your own. Because of this saying "it works like this, I know because I work there" will never be anything other than laughable, and that argument is by its very nature invalid.
So why not just disregard that part? The fact of the matter is still that Casey Hudson had free hands with the Mass Effect 3 ending. All you did was go on for several posts trying to hide the fact that you were wrong by discussing something which you yourself claim to be irrelevant.
The explanation in the video is quite hamfisted, but the idea of a finite time world is very fresh and exciting to me. I don't find the graphic style attractive at all, but this game seems to be full of really cool ideas that I think could work.
Well I believe you of course. I myself am a member of a federal law enforcement agency working in their cyber terrorism branch. And that is absolutely true and you should totally believe me. I am in no way just saying that in a pathetic attempt to add credibility to an otherwise questionable post.
If you believe me, all is good, and if you don't, nothing that I produce on this board would make you believe me. I could tell you literally anything, including that I have worked for this and that company, and you could still say "I don't believe that". I could tell you anything about the company I claim to have worked for, but all those things could be things that I have looked up or heard second- or third-hand. There is nothing that I could do on channels that I am comfortable with being tied to this user account that would make you believe me.
I post stuff, on 14 May 2015 - 09:33 PM, said:
It's stupid to mention background if you don't want to be asked about your credentials. People won't automatically beleive you, especially on the internet.
I have worked for studios associated with several major publishers, amongst them an EA-owned company.