Jump to content

  • Curse Sites
Help

Airwolf

Member Since 02 Aug 2012
Offline Last Active Yesterday, 04:40 PM

#2198798 Showoff your Legendary!

Posted Elysen on 06 May 2013 - 03:01 AM

View PostElectro Mouse, on 06 May 2013 - 02:59 AM, said:

Lets see how many Twilight's we can get.

Hopefully lots. There's a reason you see so many, because it looks awesome.


#2185183 just wondering if i could get banned for doing this? i don't think i will...

Posted Kurosov on 28 March 2013 - 02:55 PM

You won't be banned for it.

But hopefully this post will serve as a warning for other guilds not to recruit you.

Doesn't matter if they were "mean" or "insensitive". You chose to join a guild with childish people and as a so called co-leader it should have been your responsibility to make sure that never happened in the first place, yet instead you decided to steal money and do a runner instead of even leaving with dignity.

If you volunteered at a non profit organisation and even donated some of your own money then decided to run off with cash from the organisation because other people were being mean to you, that is theft and you would face the appropriate punishment.

They might not have been the best guild members, but with such an action neither are you.


#2160584 Legendary Weapon - I can't decide if I really want one. Do you?

Posted Auenwing on 08 February 2013 - 05:46 AM

Sadly, I got an in-game mail from a gold seller today with a list of legendaries they had for sell. They claimed they were the sole agent for the best equipment in game.

Yes, I reported it immediately.


ANet, you may want to consider making legendaries account bound. Not necessarily retroactively, but any new ones as of a certain date.

Just saying.


#2155309 Master of Overkill 300K?

Posted Sans on 31 January 2013 - 03:43 PM

trebuchet a rabbit


#2145743 Promote New Guild Leader

Posted ChuyDog08 on 18 January 2013 - 08:43 PM

Oh yeah, I forgot to mention that we drained all the influence and layed down all the queued banners before we left.  One last FU to him.  That may have been immature for 40 year olds to do, but it felt great.


#2136778 Mix & Matching Armour

Posted xtbx on 07 January 2013 - 12:56 AM

Posted Image


#2135261 How my Ban for Snowflake is different and unjustified!

Posted Omilla on 04 January 2013 - 03:57 PM

Everyone who got banned for this exploit will file in here over the next few days and try to tell us how they weren't trying to exploit and they only wanted to fix the economy.  Or end world hunger.  I have read several of these posts and many seem to have some fuzzy logic about how Anet wanted backpieces to be easier to get so they thought that this recipe was added to do that.  Maybe someday when a too good to be true thing presents itself to someone, they will think for 2 seconds before they dive headfirst into it and end up getting banned.


Haters gonna hate.

'Sploiters gonna sploit.

Anet gonna ban.


#2066439 What is the hardest Explorable Dungeon path?

Posted Milennin on 07 November 2012 - 10:45 AM

Citadel of Flames path 3 is pretty hard without proper communication.
Arah path 1 is hard if your team sucks at Giganticus Lupicus.
Arah path 4 is... well, you'll have to see for yourself. :D


#2134149 So it seems a lot of naughty boys and girls got one last gift from Santa this...

Posted Swoopeh on 03 January 2013 - 10:49 AM

To quote that Anet post:

Quote

I’ve seen the numbers, and the damage to the economy could have been substantial, if the exploit wasn’t closed down and if these people were allowed to use their ill-gotten gains. People whose accounts were terminated were the worst offenders. I’m talking a lot of ill gotten gains, and a significant risk to the economy.
Any time you take one thing and can make two, and then four, and then sixteen… ya gotta know that’s just wrong. (I won’t quibble on the odds, overall, doubling was not outside the rules of probability.) And to perform that action hundreds and hundreds of times? That’s call “exploitation,” my friend, and that’s against the User Agreement, the Rules of Conduct, and all that is holy.
I know the OP will disagree. But we’ve been more than kind, in the past, and everyone needs to own up to his/her errors and recognize: We all are part of the game economy, and those who exploit it are hurting the rest of us.
Exploit closed.
Worst offenders terminated.
That’s what has to happen to make things right for all of us.

The bold part is important I think to prevent taking this out of context. If they banned everyone who made a few ectos off this then I would agree that that's harsh. However they only banned those who made significant use of the exploit and made a profit thus messing with the economy.

I wouldn't have perma-banned them though, they really need a better penalty system. First strike is a warning for those who think they're doing no harm, second strike to show they mean business and the third strike you're out.


#2132972 My solo videos compilation

Posted Shadok on 01 January 2013 - 07:17 PM

If you would like to post videos, please do so in the video section of the site. The actual forums are reserved for discussion, not self promotion. Thanks!


#2126637 Gold Wars 2 - Portrait of a campaign

Posted matsif on 23 December 2012 - 04:31 PM

the game isn't P2W, its pay for convenience.  I can buy 4000 gems and trade them in for 50g, or I can spend 2 weeks farming AC to get the same amount of gold.  there is nothing in the gem store that helps in PvE content other than rez orbs and repair kits (maybe some boosters, but I have plenty of them from other parts of the game), and honestly I don't know anyone who even uses boosters all the time or even rez orbs or repair canisters to say that people are actually using them that often.

from a PvE aspect, the game is easy enough already that having these items isn't really necessary at all.  I have over 20 repair canisters in my bank that I've gotten just through opening black lion chests with keys I've gotten through leveling alts and dailies etc, not to mention the amount of unused boosters I have just sitting there because I don't see any use for them overall.

basically, buying gems for gold is just the lazy person's way around doing some easy content for an hour a day to make gold.  the gem store itself offers nothing in my mind that is a direct payment towards winning the game.  the boosters and other cons from the gem store are in no way worth it overall until you get into content that crosses the line from fun to just stupidly hard for no reason (imo).  if you have enough money to spend on gems to buy all the gold needed for a legendary, then by all means go right ahead.

if people didn't feel entitled to everything and didn't cry about not getting it instantly, then we wouldn't even be having this discussion anyways.


#1753803 Why Do Devs Always Think They Need To Tie Everything Together?

Posted Iron Legionnaire on 17 August 2012 - 04:31 PM

View PostTastySlop, on 17 August 2012 - 04:21 PM, said:

I think this is where we disagree. This may sound obvious, but you will meet more people who do mostly WvWvW while playing WvWvW, and you will meet more people who play mostly PvE content while playing PvE content. WvWvW will be predominantly people who play mostly WvWvW, not casuals from PvE.
Really, to what extent? I plan to do tons of PvE myself and really enjoy all aspects of the game. Sure, most people will gravitate more towards playstyles I like. I will play WvW more often than other things. But we are all still on the same server. Nonetheless, what about people earning money? They'll need to be in PvE. What if there's a queue? They'll need to be in PvE. I think we'll see plenty of movement back and forth, and I expect a lot of the PvE players to get into the whole server pride deal.

And, lol @ another jab at casuals. I'm a casual, dude. Casuals are not people who avoid WvW, nor are all PvE players casuals, there are some really hardcore PvE players out there.

If anything, WvW is the epitome of casual PvP.


#1720438 Please no more BWEs/Stress Tests

Posted ToujouKoneko on 12 August 2012 - 08:19 PM

You know they'll have more just to tease you :P


#1748234 Servers getting full with many guilds on them.

Posted Sleepdeprivation on 16 August 2012 - 09:43 PM

View PostLethality, on 16 August 2012 - 09:03 PM, said:

ArenaNet created the problem, it's only right they should foot the bill to fix it.



Hate to break it to you, but almost no one who is playing the game is trolling thee (or any other) forums right now, much less putting forth extra effort to pre-organize things.

i still can't decide if you are ignorant, delibratly misunderstanding things or genuinly believe that you understand the situation better than almost every body else.

FREE transfers on launch means there is no bill to foot, and the problem appears to only be in yours and a few others minds

as to the post your responding to; its saying the solution is AT WORST a paid transfer compared to an apparent attempt to change the whole server system which was being suggestted as a solution to this "problem"

as to your seconed response i can't even work out what you think you are "breaking" to anyone there

and in your case lethality, based on the volume and random negativity of your posts i don't care if i sounded rude there


#1747212 Servers getting full with many guilds on them.

Posted Howl on 16 August 2012 - 07:10 PM

On the other side, people like me, with small guilds or those who just want to play alone are perfectly fine with server caps, no queing, and certainly don't give a shit to whatever problems one or two zerg guilds matters could have because of their bad planning, I like what ANet did here and I'm sure I'm not the only one in this position, I don't want to wait to play, and I'm happy I won't so hurray for no queing.