Darothm

Lordkrall, on 03 February 2013 - 01:39 PM, said:

Selling a rare does not equal buying an exotic. Do you honestly think buying those boxes are worth it?

Be honest now.

Lordkrall, on 03 February 2013 - 01:23 PM, said:

Okay. Let me prove you wrong.

1) Boxes involves RNG four times. Will it be an exotic? Will I get the piece I need? Will it be level 80? Will it be the stat combination I want? The chance of getting what you actually need is abysmal.

2) Ascended amulets are only available through Laurels, whereas exotic armor is easily attainable through many parts of the game.

3) The time it takes to obtain one piece of exotic is ~1 hour, whereas the time it takes to obtain 5 Laurel is 90 hours.

It's quite sad that your need to prove me wrong takes a toll on people who are just asking questions on this forums. You should really question your motives before posting.

Your entire post sounds very whiny and I completely disagree. Warriors are perfectly viable, you're not supposed to have a lot of disengage skills, that's why you have the largest health and armor. You can build to have the highest consistent damage AND great burst, you have support builds too. Only thieves and mesmers (and maybe eles) can have even comparable burst. You want to complain about elites: battle standard is a rez +3 boons to all nearby allies, and the signet gives you 3 boons for 30 seconds on a 1 min CD that isn't bad, rampage sucks I agree. Eles have it way worse, elitewise. Some of the problems you point out aren't unique to the warrior, other professions have them too so stop acting like a child.

Are you kidding me? Dailies have been here since the beginning. And these aren't fetch quests, you can easily complete all the requirements of the daily just playing normally a little bit.

Stop complaining about everything.

Lucav, on 13 February 2013 - 09:31 AM, said:

I think you fail to realize how easy a flashy looking post with cool sounding names fools the majority of people on here into running crap builds with crap runes. You'll notice from the amount of views/posts how popular such bad builds have become, this build is just another crap one of many.

I put together the locations of all the known pets from the betas that will appear in all the 1 to 15 zones and 15 to 30 zones. This should help anyone wanting a specific pet, or anyone who wants to get all the pets in an area (go team beard!)

I got most of my info from:
http://www.guildwars...rexs-pet-guide/
http://www.guildwars...-pet-locations/
wdgYcG84XvI

1 to 15 zones
Queensdale:
River Drake
Forest Spider
Krytan Drakehound
Pig
Boar


Caldeon Forest:
Flamingo
Jungle Spider
Jungle Stalker
Fern Hound


Metrica Province:
Jungle Spider
Jaguar
Marsh Drake


Wayfarer Foothills:
Raven
Brown Bear
Arctodus
Ice Drake
Snow Leopard
Alpine Wolf


Plains of Ashford:
Hyena
Black Bear
Red Moa
Whiptail Devourer




15 to 30 Zones
Diessa Plateau:
Warthog
Lashtail Devourer


Brisban Wildlands:
Murrello
Siamoth


Gendarran Fields:
Brown Bear
Eagle


Snowden Drifts:
Lynx
White Moa
Owl


Kessex Hills:
Shark
Eagle
River Drake




Cities
Lion's Arch:
Blue Jellyfish
Armorfish
Pig


Black Citidel:
Lashtail Devourer
Whiptail Devourer


Hoelbrak:
Polar Bear
Raven
Snow Leopard
Ice Drake

Shiren, on 16 January 2013 - 12:29 PM, said:

Stop using bad classes and you won't have this problem.  There's going to be tiers for everything, either play top tier or learn to deal with it.  Complaining about "people won't carry my crappy character through hard content" isn't particularly productive nor is the fix (making the content easier) particularly desirable.

PVT gear on a warrior, his sigil explanation, not talking about food...

Just seems like a build from a casual that really doesn't understand builds specialized for PvP or PvE outside of easy world content and dynamic events.

I've heard some silliness going around about how Axe/Mace is supposedly the best DPS weapon.  From what I can tell, it's crap.  The numbers simply don't support it, not by a long shot.  Even assuming generous vulnerability numbers (and vulnerability sucks in general, especially since it's halved on bosses) axe is coming up much lower.  You know what?  Let's just do this:

Berserker Axe/Mace, 30/10/0/10/20: Berserker's Power, Dual Wielding, Axe Mastery, Rending Strikes (assuming 3 stacks of vulnerability), Heightened Focus, Empowered (assuming 3 boons)
Auto: 609, 1300, 2070 per 3.75s = 1061/sec
Cyclone Axe: 568 total, -313 net, -46/sec, ~6 stacks of vuln
Crushing Blow: 812 total, -249 net, -15/sec, ~3.25 stacks of vuln
Eviscerate: 1766 total, 705 net, 64/sec
Total: 1064 overall, 3452/sec

Berserker Greatsword (20/25/0/10/15) - Berserker's Power, Slashing Power, Forceful Greatsword (assuming 10 stacks of might), Heightened Focus, Rending Strikes (assuming 3 stacks of vulnerability), Empowered (assuming 3 boons)
Auto = 597, 597, 768 = 784/s, ~7.5 stacks of vuln
HB = 4690 total, 1554 net, 150/s
Bladetrail = 1280 total, 496 net, 38/s
Rush = 1450 total, 666 net, 39/s
DPS = 1011 base, 4099 overall

So someone explain why people think axe/mace is more?

Lordkrall, on 20 December 2012 - 07:22 AM, said:

Or maybe you need to stop trying to act like the forum police and just report the topic and stop baiting? What's your point in coming into a topic and whining (I'm sorry, but after 2 posts it is whining) about it being against TOS and starting up an argument in the topic about something that is frankly, so small. Report the topic, move on. What you're doing now is showing your immaturity. No one wants to see that much. It's to much information.

matsif, on 15 December 2012 - 03:53 AM, said:

I can't believe you're attempting to blame other Engineers for rightfully wanting sigils on kits, rather than laying the blame solely at the feet of Anet for this ludicrous nerf.

Majic, on 15 December 2012 - 03:42 AM, said:

The damage nerf was obviously designed to reduce the effectiveness in an attempt to oppose on crit sigils.
Adding a third guaranteed proc, and a possible fourth when triated, is not the solution to this problem.  That would compound the problem instead.
Reducing the proc from a guaranteed third to a possible third is the solution to this problem.

This keeps untraited Nades viable, addresses the on crit sigil issue, and keeps Grenadier attractive but not mandatory.

matsif, on 15 December 2012 - 03:53 AM, said:

Weapon stats are next. They wanted to get sigils in first because they promote build diversity.  But weapon stats are coming.
How about instead of whining about it, you suggest a possible solution?
I find it ironic that you're whining in the same post you call others crybabies.  It amuses me.

Aether your QQ knows no bounds. I don't think I've seen you make a post that DOESN'T include some sort of Elementalist QQ. Right now Eles are VERY viable and competitive in tPvP, especially D/D aura share Ele. If anything ANet will tone down the downed state(almost guaranteed) and buff/nerf other areas as they see fit(maybe).

2 months ago everyone thought Eles were underpowered and useless. A month ago they become a mainstay on nearly every tPvP team because people found a niche for them. At the start of the game people thought Warriors would always have a place on every single tPvP team. As people learned to play and counter Warriors they've all but disappeared from high level play. You can't just judge everything by the lowest rung(Hotjoin).

Elfen Lied, on 08 December 2012 - 11:40 AM, said:

I hope ANet learned from their mistakes and don't make another massive scale event in one specific place, or at least, not in Lion's arch.

I don't get the whole grind thing. I just play casually and amass money with time. Enough time will get you enough gold for whatever you want. I think people's real problem is that they want things right now and can't wait for them. The game is not forcing you to buy gems for gold, only your impatience makes you think you need to do that. It's a game people, you're supposed to play it for fun, if you want a sense of achievement you're looking in the wrong place.