Jump to content

  • Curse Sites

El Duderino

Member Since 25 Jan 2013
Offline Last Active Oct 09 2014 06:25 PM

#2339505 Is GW2 dead now or is it just the forums?

Posted draxynnic on 17 September 2014 - 10:20 AM

The official forums seem to have slowed down a bit as well, although it's hard to specify a cause.

I'm pretty sure player numbers are dropping, albeit hidden by features such as the megaserver... but while it may be dying, it's a slow death, and the megaserver system means that if you're playing at peak times you're probably going to see a decent population regardless. While unfortunately I'd hesitate to recommend anyone to buy in at this stage, if you already have the game, there's no reason not to jump back in.

#2336339 Billiard and Ensign

Posted Kattar on 22 August 2014 - 12:56 AM

This. This is news.

I would be very interested to know more about what you're planning.

#2336003 Billiard and Ensign

Posted Bi11iard on 19 August 2014 - 08:31 PM

I had lunch with Ensign last week - he seems to be doing okay and I am looking into doing some gaming related research with him.

#2324078 Billiard and Ensign

Posted ben911993 on 17 May 2014 - 05:15 PM

This thread gives me such nostalgia of hanging out around the GW1 guru forums. Particularly the off topic, where Faer was the undisputed lord of threads for quite some time. I think I even recall some kind of mock feud between him and Arkantos at one point.

Ah, good times.

#2313414 Billiard and Ensign

Posted Bi11iard on 02 April 2014 - 06:13 PM

Just came across this between classes - sorry for the necro. Yes I am teaching and I managed to convince Ensign to go get his PhD. Small world as we both are in the same area now! Hope all is well in Guild Wars land.

#2313472 Billiard and Ensign

Posted snograt on 02 April 2014 - 09:00 PM

"Who are Billiard and Ensign?"

Gods from a bygone age.

We shall never see their like again.

#2321141 Interview: The ArenaNet Team on the Aftermath of Season 1

Posted Konzacelt on 29 April 2014 - 09:59 PM

I must be missing something then.  To me, the dialogue is barely better than the 3rd-person cut-scenes...which is to say bad.  I honestly don't know how anyone can be the least bit engaged with the dialogue.  It's childish.

#2314796 Interview: The ArenaNet Team on the Aftermath of Season 1

Posted Desild on 07 April 2014 - 07:16 PM

Book ends for the first dull chapter of Guild Wars 2 history. It ended as it began. With a lot of refugee moving from one place to another due to a threat that will "shake the very foundations of the world".

I'd say I'm glad it is over, but then I remember this is but a prelude of things to come. Which will probably be as bad and as forgetable.

#2320321 Worth coming back to Guild wars 2?

Posted Baron von Scrufflebutt on 26 April 2014 - 01:12 PM

View PostGilles VI, on 26 April 2014 - 12:16 PM, said:

The multiplayer aspect. + some JP's, and hidden places actually require some thinking contrary to portal.

Not so sure man: I always have the feeling that GW2's jumping puzzles are done so that you fail because the screen is too dark, or the camera gets in the way or ... whereas with Portal I fail the puzzles because I can't figure out exactly what to do. In Portal you fail because you are stupid, whereas in GW2, you fail because the game treats you like you are stupid.

#2320273 Worth coming back to Guild wars 2?

Posted MazingerZ on 26 April 2014 - 07:05 AM

View Postkonsta_hoptrop, on 26 April 2014 - 06:57 AM, said:

you sound like a WoW player , i mean the bad WoW players that ignore everything that's different from WoW. There is much to do at lvl 35.  Even at lvl 80. But if you coudn't even level a single char to lvl 80, the game is not for you. No need to come back, find another game

Mildly amused.  He only said the game wasn't for him.  And then you called him a bad WoW player.  Perhaps you should solicit some deeper impressions before rushing to judge.  Near as I can tell, he just doesn't like the game.  For whatever reason.  Seems valid. A lot of people who never played WoW (GW1 players) don't like GW2.

#2320723 What GW2 does right

Posted Age on 28 April 2014 - 12:35 AM

View PostMisterB, on 01 April 2014 - 03:49 PM, said:

GW2 has no subscription cost. Nothing else matters for players like myself who won't give the game a second look if it has a pay-to-play barrier to entry.
The Original GW did that as well as as all PWE MMOs as well as LoTR.I much prefer the crafting system in PWI.When it comes to loot sharing GW did that as well.When it comes to going to to lower levels GW has hard mode if you want and get bigger/better loot.
The only thing it does right is balance the Economy instead of high inflated prices instead of seeing ecto going for say 20K a glob

#2319787 Interview: The ArenaNet Team on the Aftermath of Season 1

Posted MCBiohazard on 24 April 2014 - 01:06 PM

View PostPariah, on 24 April 2014 - 10:26 AM, said:

You could do almost all the missions in Prophecies out of order, except for Thunderhead Keep which was required to access the Ring of Fire missions... Many people skipped the Maguuma ones altogether by running to Sanctum Cay from LA, or straight to Droknar's Forge and the southern Shiverpeaks missions from Beacon's Perch. I don't miss the voice acting in GW1, but the replayability and the greater length of many of the missions is a definite plus for the first game.

The two ends of your post kind of contradict each other even though I agree with the overall message to a degree. How come people kept trying to skip Maguuma or paid for runs, especially Drok run? Probably because some of the missions in between were a bit too long to be replayable especially for an alt that's seen most of the game already (or hasn't but doesn't want to).

View Postraspberry jam, on 23 April 2014 - 09:28 AM, said:

The GW1 Prophecies storyline had something that the GW2 storyline lacks. In GW1, you start out as a member of an elite but irregular military scouting force. You get drawn into hero stuff already then though: you prevent the charr from making the final breakthrough into southern Ascalon, you go deep behind enemy lines to free people, you get to recapture the capital city! And that is before the main story even starts. By the time you get to Lion's Arch, you're a hero - but then what? Instead of joining the refugee Ascalonians, you are dumped in LA where you have to find new employment. After joining the White Mantle, you are drawn into a conspiracy theory that turns out to be true, you have to escape across the seas carrying a magical artifact, you have to find your destiny, recapture another kingdom and then finally invade the home of the bad guys - and then there is another twist waiting for you.

That you see all these story twists and narrative pumps way before they happen, or that it's all very cheesy, doesn't really matter. Because even though there were no narrative branches, it still felt like progressing the story was your choice. That is in part due to gameplay: everywhere you went, you could stay as long as you wanted and smell the flowers. There was never the feeling of "I want to do this but I have to stop and grind this first" that you (or at least I) ran into with the GW2 personal story all the time. There was also the feeling of wanting to see where the story went - you knew it would go somewhere cheesy and that it would have bad voice acting, but you never knew exactly what twist was behind the next corner (for example, I thought that Khilbron was going to turn the world undead or something, I had no idea that his plan was to summon some kinda monsters from hell itself).

In short: deep hero stuff and player agency.

Maintaining the illusion of player agency is what A-Net dropped the ball on completely with their personal story and LS and I think that's what I've been trying to say from the start in this discussion. What they ended up with was like the Mass Effect 3 ending only you didn't even have A B or C as a fake choice that comes to the same result. But that is solely a writing and narrative issue in my opinion. It isn't to say that the personal story structure didn't have or can't have the potential to be executed better. If they refocused the writing team and put together something entirely new for an 'expansion' style release, or even went back and rejiggered the entire second half of the existing personal story, it could go over well as long as they maintain the illusion that you are important and you're in control of things. Not necessarily the most important as some folks here think I was trying to say you should be, but the primary focus of your own dang personal story. It's supposed to be about you after all. Then they can throw whatever twists they want at you, no matter how cheesy they are.

For example, why do you have to go to the Mother Tree if you're not a Sylvari and can't be arsed to care? If you're any other race, you should have an equally flavorful prophecy thingy tailored to your particular race. Maybe the humans evoke their gods, the asura work some technobabble magic, the Charr don't prophesize at all but just hash it out in a tribunal council, and the Norn likewise in a moot or maybe a spirit animal quest. Instead of following the dick plant like a lapdog, you find your own way of figuring out that you have to go into that blasted wasteland. He has his thing and his mom's sword, sure, but you're going in for your own reasons instead of following his quest and his story. That's the illusion they dropped the ball on.

#2319766 Interview: The ArenaNet Team on the Aftermath of Season 1

Posted Pariah on 24 April 2014 - 10:26 AM

You could do almost all the missions in Prophecies out of order, except for Thunderhead Keep which was required to access the Ring of Fire missions... Many people skipped the Maguuma ones altogether by running to Sanctum Cay from LA, or straight to Droknar's Forge and the southern Shiverpeaks missions from Beacon's Perch. I don't miss the voice acting in GW1, but the replayability and the greater length of many of the missions is a definite plus for the first game.

#2319762 Interview: The ArenaNet Team on the Aftermath of Season 1

Posted raspberry jam on 24 April 2014 - 10:03 AM

View PostEl Duderino, on 23 April 2014 - 03:53 PM, said:

Really love this post. The illusion of choice is just as strong as real choice, if done well. Actually, the benefits may end up being better from a design perspective.
Yeah. I think that giving players just the right amount of choice while at the same time giving them something important to do will make them feel as if the parts where they can't choose are like them being dragged along by fate itself or something - like in so many tales of heroes. It sort of feels real, yet feels epic. I think that that's how you build immersion.

And yeah, it's much easier from a design perspective. Imagine doing a sandbox game that could still generate the same kind of story as in GW1. Very tricky, even in single player.

View PostKonzacelt, on 23 April 2014 - 06:43 PM, said:

I don't mean to say the PC was never important, he/she was.  But there's a difference between being an important part of the narrative, and being the backbone of the narrative.  Up until the Fire Islands, I never felt like where ever I went my fame demanded instant respect from anyone.  There were plenty of times where NPC's in cut scenes treated you as a peer and not as one above them.  And still other scenes where you were obviously the smaller fish, like with Evennia or Rurik.  The Crystal Desert area is kind of wehre you "come into your own" and start to be the worldly hero you were supposedly meant to be.  And that whole area I think is supposed to be seen as you wondering out there in the desert, searching for your fate like a forlorn, but hopeful soul.  Even in the Southern Shivs your job is to rescue others who's lives are invariably more important than yours.

Even without nearly any choice in the matter, GW1 managed to make a story with quality and immersion that kept you interested, despite the limitations and faults like sub-par voice-acting or corny side-quests.  I honestly can't put my finger on any really specific reason, other than what I've said already, as to why GW2 just doesn't "do it for me" like its predecessor.  I even started a new toon this week just to try and get a fresh take on the game with the new updates in place.  After a year of even seeing any PS cut-scenes, I still find myself immediately clicking the skip button almost every time.

/le sigh
I really like that in the crystal desert there missions are not in order, you can do them as you like. Well, I guess there is an order of sorts, but you can mostly ignore it. You are right in that before that area you are more restricted, but there is still the illusion of choice when getting to LA and having to locate the quest giver that starts the new string of missions. Before that, yes you are definitely following Rurik around. When it came to Evennia though I disagree, I felt like a hero already. She might've led the Shining Blade, but I was the tip of that organization's spear. So to speak.

Ugh the GW2 cutscenes. IMO it was a big, huge, mistake to make those cutscenes where two guys just stand there talking to each other as if on a stage. You don't even see where they are. They kill the mood so hard for me.

#2319136 Feature Patch Update Notes

Posted ilr on 22 April 2014 - 06:52 AM

Wait, are you serious?   Their "Mega Update" is to just get rid of all the unnecessary hurdles that GW1 didn't even have in the first place??  I especially love how they went and rebranded the old District system as "MegaServers".  I don't think ANYONE was stupid enough to fall for them passing off all this unnecessary feature ♥♥♥♥-blocking as "Content" to begin with.  Oh and lol they nerfed dungeon rewards even more I see.  Guess some things never change. :eek:

Why did this take a year and a half again?  I'm confused.  It sure as heck ain't no "expansion"